Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


NFL Network: Bears' Briggs, 31st Pick for Skins' 6th Pick?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Briggs and the 31st overall pick for our 6th overall pick:
I love it, great deal! 27 18.37%
I hate it, don't do it! 120 81.63%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-27-2007, 08:09 AM   #11
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
Re: NFL Network: Bears' Briggs, 31st Pick for Skins' 6th Pick?

ESPN.com - NFL - Agent: Bears' Briggs could go to Redskins in trade

"But it's a win-win situation," Rosenhaus said. "Chicago only wants to sign Lance to a one-year contract anyway. If they made the trade, they would move up 25 spots in the first round and be able to choose one of the premier players in the draft. And Lance, obviously, would get the long-term deal he wants [from the Redskins]. It's a good resolution for everyone."

he doesnt mention the skins as part of the winners... We deserve more for the 6th pick that a player and the 31st...briggs isnt goign to play for them, they have no leverage...we should give them both our sixth picks and say you got a good deal on adam, heres your sixth pick back, and ours
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.89006 seconds with 12 queries