04-22-2007, 07:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Is Russell really better than Quinn?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Quinn also had a better bench press.
I don't know why so many scouts think difference between having the arm to make every NFL throw (Quinn), and having the arm to throw 60 yards from your butt (Russell) makes a difference, much less one that outweighs all of Quinn's other advantages. In any other line of work, doing your job this poorly would be immediate grounds for dismissal. IMO, the profession of scouting has become a joke. These people are unwilling to learn from their mistakes.
I'm being very careful to not blame Russell for a mess he didn't create. If he didn't have a bunch of 70 year old scouts watching his every move, he could be drafted at a spot more adventageous to his experience level low 1 or early 2, and he would be allowed more time to develop on a better team. It wouldn't make Russell any better of a prospect, but it would give him reasonable expectations and allow him, if he worked hard enough and earned his way onto the field, to achieve a reasonable amount of success relative to his skill level
Russell is going to get screwed because a bunch of guys can't do their job. I'm not anti-JaMarcus Russell. I just think any process that would rate him over Quinn is a joke. In my mind, its no longer even an issue.
|
Do you think Russell is not good, or just overrated? I think he is pretty good but just overrated this draft because of his arm strength and size.
__________________
Vacancy
|
|
|