Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2007, 07:31 PM   #61
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Quote:
Originally Posted by #56fanatic View Post
so i guess Clayton is the smartest and most knowledgable NFL analyst there is right?
He's pretty good wouldn't you say?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-05-2007, 07:36 PM   #62
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip View Post
Thank God those contractual obligations exist because this program was an absolute delight. Does anyone know when it will be on again?
Not on the schedule for the foreseeable future...so you can find something else to bitch about
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 07:47 PM   #63
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
As for our analogy, what has Gibbs done the past 3 years to warrant the belief that we are playoff bound? We have issues on the O-line, and a first full year starting QB with I might add a real problem if he gets injured for any significant time this season for lack of a backup who can win games.

The only thing I believe we can hang our hats on this up coming season is our defense, I wouldn't be surprised to see a repeat of the 2005 season when the defense carried this team to the playoffs and hid a lot of our lack offensive ability. Yes we are more talented on offense this year but will it really make a big difference? Gibbs has put all his eggs in 1 basket in Campbell, if he's not the goods we are a last place team.

I think whether we have legitimate issues on the offensive line really remains to be seen. Unless Chris Samuels has completely fallen apart and Pete Kendall is a bust, then I would agree. But that scenerio doesn't exist. Concern, yes. Issues, no. We'll be fine on the offensive line.

Certainly Gibbs is putting all of his eggs in one basket with Campbell, but what coach isn't with their first string quarterback? Same could be said of Indy, the Pats, Bengals, ummm Dallas....and the list goes on and on. Hell, Cleveland is flipping coins from one week to the next to figure out who their quarterback is! Talk about finishing last, now that's a classic example.

If we live or die with Jason Campbell, I'm fine with that. As long as we do more living than dying.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 08:07 PM   #64
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
I think whether we have legitimate issues on the offensive line really remains to be seen. Unless Chris Samuels has completely fallen apart and Pete Kendall is a bust, then I would agree. But that scenerio doesn't exist. Concern, yes. Issues, no. We'll be fine on the offensive line.

Certainly Gibbs is putting all of his eggs in one basket with Campbell, but what coach isn't with their first string quarterback? Same could be said of Indy, the Pats, Bengals, ummm Dallas....and the list goes on and on. Hell, Cleveland is flipping coins from one week to the next to figure out who their quarterback is! Talk about finishing last, now that's a classic example.

If we live or die with Jason Campbell, I'm fine with that. As long as we do more living than dying.
Seriously, isn't this exactly what we've wanted since the beginning of last season?? The switch and full commitment to the future in Jason Campbell??!! Now it's hear and people are still griping. I don't get it.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2007, 08:22 PM   #65
Cowell
Impact Rookie
 
Cowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

There will be griping until there are wins. As good as Jason looked last year, he didn't win. I know he didn't have a defense to play with and he did look good but there are always going to be doubters when your team goes 5-11 the year before.
Cowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 05:59 AM   #66
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Mark"stinky"Schlerth needs to be jolly stomped

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Seriously, isn't this exactly what we've wanted since the beginning of last season?? The switch and full commitment to the future in Jason Campbell??!! Now it's hear and people are still griping. I don't get it.
It's about not having anything behind Campbell, not every teams season is shot if the starter goes down, especially on a team with a coach who doesn't ask the QB to win the game just don't lose it, we know that doesn't work from watching Brunell for 3 years, Campbell is going to have to win games but not in the manor of a Peyton Manning etc. but he will have to make play's which Brunell has proven he can't. We have no one who can play a legitimate backup role, we should already have a young, up and coming QB who is learning this system, not a has been, and a never was. If Campbell goes down it's over, and we don't know even if he stays healthy if he has what it takes to win in the NFL? I believe everyone is elated that Brunell is on the bench and Campbell is starting but we have no contingency plan if he goes down. Gibbs IMO has failed miserably on building depth at the most important position on the field, the QB.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.34218 seconds with 12 queries