![]() |
|
|
#76 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#77 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
In a twisted sort of way, I liked the coverage.
I like the fact that all the so called experts picked the Eagles to win (Tom Jackson was the only one that had the guts to pick the Skins). I like the fact that the entire nation picked the Eagles to win in a National wide poll. I like the fact that all the pre-game hype was pumping up the Eagles to be the best team in the NFC East and what has happened to the NFC East, it used to be one of the best conferences in the NFL, bullcrap. I like the fact how they pumped up Brian Dawkins to be the X-man Wolverine. I loved it when Mike Sellers trucked him and Todd Yoder took him out. I especially liked how during the postgame the analysts made excuses for the Eagles; McNabb injury caused him to be ineffective, playing in Philly is tough, the Eagles passed too much, they should have run Westbrook more... ...whay...whay...whay...whay Cry Me A River!!!
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
Everyone already knows Philly fans are jerks, there's no reason to hold a quarter-long conversation about it and cause us to miss plays. It was one of the worst-commentated games I've ever watched, BUT...it was a great game on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Also, did anyone see the intro to the game with McNabb standing still and pushing off about 10 Redskins with stiffarms and then throwing the ball...all while whining about how much he wants to play good?
That was ridiculous. After it was over I was just staring at the TV saying, "WHAT WAS THAT?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
SmootSmack, does ESPN get all this? Do they honestly listen to the criticism? Is there a way we can voice our opinions to them? What is the reason for having guests in the booth for a quarter talking about everything BUT football? No other network has a guest line up like that!
Personally, I thought the old Sunday night crew of Mike Patrick, Paul McGuire and Joe Thiesmann was fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 113
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Aren't you amazed, though, that they dropped Joey T and yet managed to talk even more? I think Joe served the purpose of keeping the other guys from talking and that was a GOOD thing.
I didn't hear them say that the Eagle fans booed Santa Clause. Did I miss it? I loved the video clip of Campbell's eyes though. That was gold. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
I suppose the only thing we can chalk this up to was it was a Philly home game, and it might have been different coverage if the Skins were at home. Or maybe I'm really grasping at straws here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
How ironic was it that they chased his ass across the stadium all night. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
They cheered when Michael Irvin broke his neck. They booed when the team drafted McNabb. (hilarious video) ESPN - Philly fans' rogue image got boost when Santa booed in 1968 - NFL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 68
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Worst coverage I've ever seen. Totally disrespected the Redskins, too. ESPN should be ashamed of themselves! Why the hell is Charles Barkley, a washed-up BASKETBALL player, commenting on a FOOTBALL game, anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W. Central Florida
Posts: 599
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
__________________
Charmed your drug addled candor knows no bounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W. Central Florida
Posts: 599
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
__________________
Charmed your drug addled candor knows no bounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
There were some really good production elements in the show... THe Campbell eyes package was EMMY award winning type stuff. That was the big criticism about Campbell up to this point and that was really spot on how they covered his progression. I also liked the McNabb package showing 6 plays where he missed open recievers. Really told the story of the game. I agree the booth was shown way too much and as a die-hard skins fan I felt a disconnect to what was going on the field at some points. When Landry totally whiffed on Westbrook I wanted a mention of that how he just was introduced to the NFL and I wanted a replay of Taylor's huge hit. The fumble that was overturned was bizarre... I'm watching and seeing the ball move and start to come out and everyone else refs included saw something else, it was like the twlight zone. Only thing i could think of is the ball came loose and he regained control and touched his knee down, wouldn't know however becasue they were talking about other shizz. Also the tease right before kick was excellent, no other network can match that piece hands down. Guarantee all the other networks are scratcning their heads trying to think of ways to produce that type of element ... Even though i didn't like seeing McNabb avoid skins, he's done so in 8 of the last 11 games so it's the story. He was one of the biggest, if not the biggest star in the game. Barkley is a personality like Howard Stern, people really love him and will watch or people really hate and will watch to see what he'll say next, liked him in their but was in for too long I agree.
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Game Coverage Sucks
ya'll pretty much said everything . . .
the mcnabb commercial where he was tossing current identifiable skins D players around like the scene with Neo and a zillion agents in Matrix 2 was f'in ridick-ulus not playing ST and some other replays b/c they were jabbering on about philly fans and andy reids personal family problems was complete BS (much like espn making a big deal out of the noose before the terps national game) having the whole nation plus all-but-one so called "expert" picking the eagles to win, thanks tom jackson . . BUT THAT TONY K INTRO WAS NICE . . . let the whole nation know how we feel about Saint Joe . . . if they didnt know already! side note - swami, parcells and others looked real stupid in my mind even though they were trying to defend joe gibbs by saying he inherited a team w/ salary cap hell and not "joe gibbs" type players by saying now they finally have 2 running backs who fit his system and and an O-line to run behind . . . well we've had portis, betts and the dirtbags when gibbs got here so it wasnt a matter of getting the right players but a matter of getting the right plays called and having a QB who can throw the ball more than 15 yards. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|