Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Clinton Portis

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2007, 09:54 AM   #46
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
that fumble lies more on Campbell then Portis. its his responsibility to make sure the hand-off hits portis in the chest
There is some responsibility on Campbell, but the majority is on Portis. The ball hit his arm. This is RB 101, you always have your arms opened where you receive the ball. This is practiced everyday and is inexcusable for a $ 5M + per year RB.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-25-2007, 10:46 AM   #47
redskinsking14
Camp Scrub
 
redskinsking14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington,dc
Age: 32
Posts: 25
Re: Clinton Portis

i think they should had let mike (sellers) run it in! he would got it in! but we shouldnt have let the giants get back in the game!
redskinsking14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 10:55 AM   #48
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Clinton Portis

Maybe before people pass blame you may want to watch the last play again and if you notice the left side of the line Yodder missed the snape count. I have only seen one person on TV up in DC point this out. They showed the play from the line of scrimge and he was pretty late getting on his block.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 10:57 AM   #49
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Maybe before people pass blame you may want to watch the last play again and if you notice the left side of the line Yodder missed the snape count. I have only seen one person on TV up in DC point this out. They showed the play from the line of scrimge and he was pretty late getting on his block.
Once again confusion with time running out. I though Gibbs would have had this ironed out by now.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 11:04 AM   #50
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
Once again confusion with time running out. I though Gibbs would have had this ironed out by now.
That was only one player missing the snape count so I'm not sure that can be blamed on Gibbs because everyone else knew the snape count. The problem was that was the side we were running the play. The big mistake was not running JC up the middle on the first down as Giants did not have their goal line package in and that play was wide open.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 11:17 AM   #51
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Clinton Portis

I wouldn't call what happened at the end of the game confusion. If anything I chalk it up to having a young, inexperienced QB in the game. A vet wouldn't have rushed things on the last play. But that's life with a young QB. At least he was able to get us in position to win.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 11:21 AM   #52
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: Clinton Portis

one of the miscues was due to santana looking injured and JC was checking on him...

with the spike (#2), yes i would have preferred a QB sneak, but i can understand wanting to give JC time to get the right personnel in the game...esp given his experience and what had been going on up until that point....
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper.
- Churchill
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 11:57 AM   #53
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunellMVP? View Post
one of the miscues was due to santana looking injured and JC was checking on him...

with the spike (#2), yes i would have preferred a QB sneak, but i can understand wanting to give JC time to get the right personnel in the game...esp given his experience and what had been going on up until that point....
The sneak would have worked because (if I saw correctly and my seats look right down the goal line) the Giants had their pass D still in the game and had only three men on the line. By spiking the ball we also gave them a chance to get their run D on the field.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.84671 seconds with 12 queries