Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


I guess Romo's contract extension

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2007, 03:38 AM   #91
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Suggestion.....why don't you two just agree to disagree and leave it at that? The irony of this whole debate is this is a Redskins fan board, but if you look at the thread with the most reads, it is this one that is titled for Tony Romo, a Dallas Cowboy.

That is kinda like what Larry the Cable guy says...."It's like wipin before you crap.......it just don't make sense".
So in that analogy, Romo is the crap? LOL.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-13-2007, 12:42 PM   #92
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
Not to nit pick, but Garrard still wouldn't make the roster.

Brady, 1383 yards, 16 tds, 2 ints
Manning, 1319 yards, 10 tds, 2 ints
Anderson, 1251 yards, 11 tds, 8 ints
Palmer, 1171 yards, 10 tds, 6 ints
Roethlisberger, 1013 yards, 9 tds, 3 ints
Garrard, 848 yards, 4 tds, 0 ints.

Not sure who he would push out there, he needs to put up better numbers to be considered. Garrard is not making mistakes, but he's not playing the game to win either, he's playing not to lose. (not that there is anything wrong with that if it works, but it's rare that conservative QB's with low numbers make the pro bowl)
He has one less game than everyone on that list. Rate stats, man!!

Here's the lowdown on Garrard: 7.8 Y/A on 67% completion. He's got no picks in over 100 attempts. That's why if the season ended today, he'd be in the probowl.

The season doesn't end today, but Garrard is still having a damn good season.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2007, 02:16 PM   #93
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
So in that analogy, Romo is the crap? LOL.

I would consider it highly ill regular if there was a thread on a Cowboys fan board titled for Jason Campbell, and that thread was the 3rd most read and 3rd most active thread on the board.

And that is what you have here...a Romo thread taking over a Redskins board.

If he really was "crap" as you say....then why waste all that time talking about it on your fan board?
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2007, 02:36 PM   #94
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
I would consider it highly ill regular if there was a thread on a Cowboys fan board titled for Jason Campbell,
That's because Campbell is too hard to spell for the typical posters found on a Cowboys fan board.

On a serious note, I did read where Romo's father was diagnosed with cancer a couple of days after the Bears game. I can definitely see that kind of news having an impact on anyone's performance. I hate to see anyone, friend or foe, have to deal with that.

Fact is Romo plays his butt off and I haven't seen or heard him run his mouth. It's a terrible waste for him to be a member of the Cowboys organization.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2007, 10:56 PM   #95
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
He has one less game than everyone on that list. Rate stats, man!!
Not everyone...Palmer has 4 games as well.

Quote:
Here's the lowdown on Garrard: 7.8 Y/A on 67% completion. He's got no picks in over 100 attempts. That's why if the season ended today, he'd be in the probowl.

The season doesn't end today, but Garrard is still having a damn good season.
Well, considering in the past 9 seasons, here is the break down on how many QB's have been sent to the pro bowl from the AFC:
1998- 3
1999- 3
2000- 4
2001- 3
2002- 3
2003- 3
2004- 3
2005- 5
2006- 3

So as you can see, they send 3 QB's from the AFC most of the time. No way is he having a better season than Brady and Manning (that is not debatable), so Garrard would have to beat out Palmer and Roethlisberger for that last spot. (he should be able to beat out Anderson, so I'll just drop him out now, but if he continues his hot hand, he'll have to come back in) Do you really think Garrard's 1 td per game average is enough to beat out those two? Big ben is averaging just under 2 tds per game, and a +6 TD to INT ratio, and Palmer has a 2.5 td per game average with a +4 td to int ratio (same amount of games and butt load more tds and passing yards.) So while I do agree Garrard is looking decent, he is not a pro bowler just yet. He would be my 5th choice in AFC. Not to mention the pro bowl is a popularity contest and Palmer and Big Ben have much better well known names.

Garrard is on pace for 16 td's, I can't think of anyone in recent memory (Minus Vick) that has made the pro bowl with only 16 tds over the course of the season.
So while I understand your comments for lifting Garrard up, don't lift him up too high. He deserves to be ranked around #5 or so in the AFC, but that doesn't make him a pro bowler.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2007, 11:01 PM   #96
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
I would consider it highly ill regular if there was a thread on a Cowboys fan board titled for Jason Campbell, and that thread was the 3rd most read and 3rd most active thread on the board.

And that is what you have here...a Romo thread taking over a Redskins board.

If he really was "crap" as you say....then why waste all that time talking about it on your fan board?
I never once said he was crap, just pointing out that you used an analogy that compared him to crap. Kinda funny.

I don't think it matters what is the most active thread...we had a thread on here (forgot what SS renamed it) that got over 5000 posts...it was a thread about nothing...whatever we wanted to talk about that night.
If we made a thread that said "the cowboys suck!" it would get more posts and hits than this thread. Quite frankly I don't see you point in even saying anything about it. We'll talk about nothing at all, and the "super happy fun thread" has something like 3000 posts and that's mainly about utube.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 08:30 AM   #97
redskinz79
Camp Scrub
 
redskinz79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seoul, Korea
Age: 45
Posts: 76
Re: I guess Romo's contract extension

I am still not sold on Romo. I'm think'n maybe a one hit wonder... I think this cowboys team could probably win with even grossman as their QB.
redskinz79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.35590 seconds with 12 queries