![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins Insider - JC Through 15 Games
Quote:
We obviously called a lot of runs against both Arizona and New York. I'm not sure that's particularly conservative, I think we just decided it was the best way to attack them. Anyway, the consequence was that the score in both those games was a lot closer than anyone thought it would be. Well, if your gameplan is to run the ball and play good D...well then, yeah the score is going to be close. Some fans deem this playing to "not lose". Well, aside from how ridiculous that statement sounds...isn't not losing a good thing anyway. The point is we could have lost to Arizona, but only because if you are trying to pace the game like the Redskins have, you don't have an allowance for a failed onside kick recovery. The allowance for turnovers in Gibbs-style football isn't there, but it's not like you can totally prevent them from happening. You can just severly cut down on them. But it's NOT like our propensity to not turn the ball over is CAUSING the offense to not score and this is something our fans need to realize. Less turnovers=good. Inconsistency on offense=bad. Both are characteristic of the Washington Redskins this season, but they are not related. If we turn the ball over against equal or lesser teams multiple times, we are going to get upset. Fortunately it hasn't happened yet this year, and we are 5-3, but I think thats something we really have to focus on this week. Who cares how "conservative" we are being. If we don't turn the ball over, and we move the ball, the offense is doing its job.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|