Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Is Sean Taylor that good or...

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2007, 06:06 PM   #1
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Is Sean Taylor that good or...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigD View Post
Would be a different game? Most probably. Would the outcome be different? Very much doubt that.

Last year, the game they played here with the blocked FG (GRRR), TO dropped a beauty from Romo, Taylor had nothing to do with it. He also had a TD in that game so ST is not shutting him down or anything. 7 catches for 76 yards and a TD is not a bad production by any stretch. The first game against Washington, he had a broken hand that he was hiding from the coaching staff.

Like some said here, ST is a safety not a CB. He can't shut TO down on those long passes. I have seen ST get burned by decent receivers.
Facts are facts though. TO has never gone for over 100yards or more than 1TD in a game that Sean Taylor has started. Taylor laid the hit that broke his finger last year too. #21 loves ringing that loudmouth's bell, and I don't think there's any way TO has half the game he had if Taylor is in there. Obvioulsy Taylor wouldn't be lined up 1 on 1 with TO, but when he rolls over on him in coverage, TO struggles.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.86572 seconds with 11 queries