|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-03-2008, 05:28 PM | #61 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: After Mooch interview, John Clayton still predicts Fassel
This is hilarious!!!!!!! I wanted Fassel to replace Spurrier til Dan was able to get Coach back!!!!!! Now we are going to get Fassel and I am having some deep reservationsa about it. All he has done since losing the Giants HC position was being a consultant for a crappy Ravens team and now we still want him? I did want him before since he seemed to get more out of an otherwise medicore Giants squad back in the day, but I am not sure he is the guy to continue the rebuilding process. Seems like we are going backwards again.
|
Advertisements |
02-03-2008, 05:30 PM | #62 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: After Mooch interview, John Clayton still predicts Fassel
Neither one would probubly be a bad choice. If you go with the young guys your taking a gamble. Will they turn out to be another Gruden or not. The safe bet is with the old guys who have been around. So when looking at Fossil or Mooch which fits better. We know we will be running a WC offense. Does Fassil know how to run it? If he has never been in a WC style offense and we have an option between him and one who has I would prefer the one who has. Does this make Mooch perfect? no. He has worked for Walch and learned a little bit I'm sure. He worked for Holmgren in Green Bay and taught Farve. Then you have Zorn who is a WC coordinator and has worked for Holmgren in Seattle and is a QB coach who taught Hasselhoff(who by the way is not the greatest). It would be nice to have to talented coach's to be able to teach JC and give pointers. Plus both bring the WC style to the table.
All Fossil is if he has not been in the WC style is a glorified motivational speaker. pump up the team and allow the co ordinators to call the plays and make adjustments. Oh wait he might get to throw the red flag once and a while. |
|
|