Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What direction would you prefer the Skins to take??

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-03-2008, 05:16 PM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: What direction would you prefer the Skins to take??

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
build from the trenches out. name me one successful team that isn't rock solid on both sides of the ball.
Pittsburgh is pretty awful on the OL, but then again, they are pretty terrible on offense.

Indianapolis seems like the exception to the rule here.

I agree, if you can be good in the trenches, the wins will continue to come. Getting good and staying good in the trenches seems to be the hard part: every team strives for it, but a lot of teams just can't accomplish it no matter how many resources they invest in it (Oakland).

I definitely think we could get closer if we invest more in it. Also, Blache needs to give them a fighting chance, and use the blitz as a change up instead of a defensive scheme in and of itself. We might actually be good on the DL, but it's tough to get pressure on the QB when you blitz as often as the Redskins do.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Last edited by GTripp0012; 12-03-2008 at 05:21 PM.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.59927 seconds with 11 queries