Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


lets discuss the free agents we really dont want and why!

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-24-2009, 08:57 PM   #11
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: lets discuss the free agents we really dont want and why!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Brave View Post
For the Vick Haters...his on the field is better than any QB we have had since Rip...no excuse for this off the field...Vick equals +2 plus wins for you team, he is not coming here so probably not worth the debate.
1.) Compare Vicks 05 Stats to Brunell
Passing Stats
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2001 ATL 8 50 113 44.2 785 6.9 2 52 3 62.7
2002 ATL 15 231 421 54.9 2936 7.0 16 74 8 81.6
2003 ATL 5 50 100 50.0 585 5.9 4 49 3 69.0
2004 ATL 15 181 321 56.4 2313 7.2 14 62 12 78.1
2005 ATL 15 214 387 55.3 2412 6.2 15 58 13 73.1
2006 ATL 16 204 388 52.6 2474 6.4 20 55 13 75.7
Brunell

2004 WAS 9 118 237 49.8 1194 5.0 7 49 6 63.9
[B]2005 WAS 16 262 454 57.7 3050 6.7 23 78 10 85.9

Yes, Mark Brunell was even better then Vick.

2.) No QB will be successful here with the lack of Oline that we have.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.56815 seconds with 11 queries