![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#121 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
I'm going 1)Saints 2)49ers 3)Jax 4)Patriots and 5)Carolina
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#122 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
If you're one of these teams why aren't they on the phone with Vick's agent?
1. SF I'm still amazed that Shawn Hill has started games in the NFL. Smith is a bigger bust than Russell. 2. Clev......Anderson and Quinn, nothing more needs to be said 3. Oakland....Russell is looking like a HUGE bust, not that he has a chance in Oak 4. Jacksonville...who backs up Garrard? 5. Carolina....who backs up Delhomme? |
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
Quote:
2) Does Vick really improve the quarterback situation in any of these places? I mean, you have to weigh the positives (the talent) with the negatives (pretty much everything else). Picking up Vick for the reasons you describe would be the trademark of a bad organization. Which is not to say that there aren't good situations for Michael Vick, just that, if you are the one of the first three teams on your list, you'd like to at least see what you have in Smith/Russell/Quinn first. Some would say that a player or two of those have already busted, but to act like Vick is a better option, that's just being hypocritical. Don't replace your homegrown unproven talent with an external unproven talent that happens to be a felon. Now if you are Pittsburgh, New England, or Carolina, be my guest. If you think you have a role for Vick, give him a shot. But don't take any of his crap trying to chase some mythical goal.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Vick can sign, may have to sit four games
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W. Central Florida
Posts: 599
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
And now PFT states that "Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes" Uggh...please no MV in a Redskins uni!@#$%! Must...consider...source (PFT).
Latest News and Rumors | ProFootballTalk.com |
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
Quote:
If his ability is anywhere on the map of where it was when he left, how would it hurt the team? This guy is going to be a choir boy when he is signed. I almost wish he would tell the first reporter, "Yes, I killed some dogs and I am sorry about that but there are people playing in this league who didn't miss a game after participating in the killing of human beings. Why don't you go harass them". This whole thing is a farce. |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: W. Central Florida
Posts: 599
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
Quote:
And I completely agree with your comment about the fact that Vick has served time for killing dogs (which is deplorable) while other NFL players have killed humans but continue to walk the street and playing fields free. Just doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
Here we go again! LOL
Campbell will never be the guy in DC as long as the media is concerned.. I knew they would have us in the Vick sweepstakes and honestly I wouldn't mind trying Latest News and Rumors | ProFootballTalk.com it out..
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
Just pointing out the obvious....
TC is 37 yo. MV is 29 yo. Just saying. To be honest I would like to see JC, CB, and Daniels. but I guess there has to be someone who is considerd a vetran .....besides JC even if he has several yrs under his belt. |
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 41
Posts: 5,928
|
Re: Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
vicks accuracy isnt good enough for me 2 consider him in the offense we run....
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,606
|
Re: Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
I would love it.................
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 54
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
I really don't have a problem with adding Vick. I think he'll end up in New England, Buffalo, San Francisco, Denver or Washington. Will the UFL fold now?
__________________
^21^ |
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
If we sign Vick than Collins is out. Vick will be use on special plays only such as short yardage and goal line situations. He is always a threat to run as well as throw. This would be a good move for insurance purposes and give our opponets more to prepare for. Jason is our future but Vick would give us a added dimension.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
#134 | ||
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Don't rule out Redskins in Vick sweepstakes
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Vick conditionally reinstated by NFL (updated)
Vick's biggeest problem is the postition he plays. If he was a RB, WR or LB I think he'd have teams lined up to sign but he's a QB and teams build themselves around their QB. I just dont see how Vick improves any team at QB.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|