Vilma defensive rookie of the year

PSUskinsfan11 · 01-07-2005, 02:13 PM

Vilma won with 21 votes, Daunta Robinson came in second with 12. Sean Taylor finished 4th with 3 votes. No votes for Erik Coleman....5th round pick from washington st. 100 tackles 2 sacks and 4ints.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1961442

TheMalcolmConnection · 01-07-2005, 02:15 PM

I don't think Sean should have won, but I would have thought maybe higher than 4th... Oh well. Still a complete beast.

cpayne5 · 01-07-2005, 02:31 PM

Yeah, no surprise Vilma won. If the Skins were a dominant offensive team too, Taylor would have garnered more votes.

Big C · 01-07-2005, 02:36 PM

i think if taylor hadnt missed that game he was suspended, and had started from the beginning of the year, then he would have been much higher, and maybe even have won it. his stats were hurt by that.

TheMalcolmConnection · 01-07-2005, 02:41 PM

The stat I care most about though is who's more feared? Vilma or Taylor? :thumb:

jamf · 01-07-2005, 03:40 PM

ramseyfan is on suicide watch since boulware didnt win

jdlea · 01-07-2005, 05:00 PM

I think Sean Taylor should have taken it.

redsk1 · 01-07-2005, 05:17 PM

Yea, to be honest i haven't kept up with the others that much, but i can't believe ST is the 4th best def rookie...

SKINSnCANES · 01-07-2005, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

The stat I care most about though is who's more feared? Vilma or Taylor? :thumb:

You say that assuming its an easy anwser. In college Vilma was known as the most dominant and pefect tackler that anyone had ever seen. In the national championship game they were talking about vilma hits so perfectly that you dont feel it becaue you go down clean. Literally on the same drive he made a hit, they said how it was perfect ,and the guy got carted off the field. Taylor has always been known as more of a ball hawk then a hitter, Roy williams is a pure hitter but not as good of a coverage guy.

saden1 · 01-07-2005, 07:22 PM

Taylor didn't deserve it.

Daseal · 01-07-2005, 07:33 PM

Honestly, Taylor didn't deserve it. Vilma was a decent choice, but Robinson may have been my #1.

itvnetop · 01-07-2005, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Honestly, Taylor didn't deserve it. Vilma was a decent choice, but Robinson may have been my #1.

agreed... robinson plays one of the toughest positions in football and to represent as a rookie speaks volumes.

MTK · 01-08-2005, 01:09 PM

Vilma was an instant impact player, I got to see him quite a bit this year and I was always impressed. He definitely doesn't play like a rookie.

01-07-2005, 02:15 PM	#2
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	I don't think Sean should have won, but I would have thought maybe higher than 4th... Oh well. Still a complete beast. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

01-07-2005, 02:31 PM	#3
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	Yeah, no surprise Vilma won. If the Skins were a dominant offensive team too, Taylor would have garnered more votes. __________________ "It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."

01-07-2005, 02:36 PM	#4
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	i think if taylor hadnt missed that game he was suspended, and had started from the beginning of the year, then he would have been much higher, and maybe even have won it. his stats were hurt by that. __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

01-07-2005, 02:41 PM	#5
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	The stat I care most about though is who's more feared? Vilma or Taylor? :thumb: __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

01-07-2005, 02:13 PM	#1
PSUskinsfan11 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: the port, PA Age: 40 Posts: 692	Vilma defensive rookie of the year Vilma won with 21 votes, Daunta Robinson came in second with 12. Sean Taylor finished 4th with 3 votes. No votes for Erik Coleman....5th round pick from washington st. 100 tackles 2 sacks and 4ints. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1961442

01-07-2005, 03:40 PM	#6
jamf Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca Posts: 5,319	ramseyfan is on suicide watch since boulware didnt win

01-07-2005, 05:00 PM	#7
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 40 Posts: 3,109	I think Sean Taylor should have taken it.

01-07-2005, 05:17 PM	#8
redsk1 The Starter Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,351	Yea, to be honest i haven't kept up with the others that much, but i can't believe ST is the 4th best def rookie...

01-07-2005, 07:22 PM	#10
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Taylor didn't deserve it.

01-07-2005, 07:33 PM	#11
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Honestly, Taylor didn't deserve it. Vilma was a decent choice, but Robinson may have been my #1.

01-08-2005, 01:09 PM	#13
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Vilma was an instant impact player, I got to see him quite a bit this year and I was always impressed. He definitely doesn't play like a rookie.

Vilma defensive rookie of the year

Locker Room Main Forum