![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
Car
85 yds 456 avg 5.4 tds 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
Be careful, mredskins may call you names for saying this.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
Hopefully by next year we HAVE an offensive line. Samuels is pretty much gone. Thomas is up there in age and every season seems to take a season ending injury. Heyer stinks as does Rabach. Who do we have left? Dockery. Well. I guess that's something to build off of.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
I'd rather have J. Norwood and a larger back (L. Johnson or L. White) to run by commitee, if we go the free agent route. Although we need a young burner, I don't see how we could justify drafting one (with our needs at OL and QB) except for finding a gem in the mid to late rounds.
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins need to sign Ricky Williams.
Quote:
You can build an OL with a Derrick Dockery type at left guard, but you have to do so pretty much willing to accept that he will be the 5th best lineman. He's proved durable, so we could do worse (i.e. everyone else we were planning to start this year). If we were to truly rebuild the OL, Dockery would have to go as well. At this point, half-assing it might not be such a bad idea. We need new tackles, but until we figure something out, it's hard to evaluate what we have on offense. Luckily, we have nothing else on offense. So there's not really any evaluation errors we have to worry about.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|