gardner haters

skinsguy · 02-05-2005, 01:32 PM

Yes Gardner is asking for the trade and really, what exactly are we losing if we lose Gardner? A receiver that has not been consistant for us! Sure, he has made some nice catches, but I would rather have a receiver that drops the acrobatic passes but catches 80% of the passes thrown his way rather than one that catches the acrobatic catches but drops at least 60% of his passes.

We need three receivers that can step up and be the man! I think Rod would thrive more in an offense that passes the ball 2:1 verse the run.

02-05-2005, 01:32 PM	#37
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Yes Gardner is asking for the trade and really, what exactly are we losing if we lose Gardner? A receiver that has not been consistant for us! Sure, he has made some nice catches, but I would rather have a receiver that drops the acrobatic passes but catches 80% of the passes thrown his way rather than one that catches the acrobatic catches but drops at least 60% of his passes. We need three receivers that can step up and be the man! I think Rod would thrive more in an offense that passes the ball 2:1 verse the run. __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"

gardner haters

Locker Room Main Forum