![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Altavista Virginia
Age: 35
Posts: 712
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Jason needs to return. I'll admit I was personally skeptic of him being our QB earlier but he has shown so much grit and leadership the past month I would think it be awful to not bring him back. What other alternative is there??
__________________
#21 Never Forget HOKIES! |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#92 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Unless he hires a General Manager (or Head Coach / General Manager) who will let Snyder have his say.... and then do whatever the he (the GM) wants to do, anyways. Snyder did this when he hired marty. He didn't like the arrangement so he fired him after only a year. However, a decade of mediocrity may make him realize that he needs to hire another marty-esque guy to run things.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Quote:
As for my long-running guess of Billick, obviously this has nothing to do with that. Billick is truly a 100% guess of mine based on nothing but gut feeling. The thoughts in this thread are not 100% based on gut feeling
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Here is a pretty rare thought, keep Zorn, offer campbell the 1 yr tender and build on something. Two first round picks should be offensive lineman. This team is playing really well the last 5 weeks and it would suck to blow it all up and start over AGAIN!
I think Lewis is making a difference, but also i think these young guys are starting to learn how to play. Thomas, Davis have stepped up by being on the field to learn. They have the weapons on offense to be really good. I would rather give Zorn and these guys another year to build on the improved play than to start over again next year. If Dallas keeps losing and dont make the playoffs or get beat in 1st round then Shanahan will be there next year. Dallas is his first choice from what I hear on TV. I am not a fan of Shanahan because he will want to be the coach and GM, then we will be stuck with the same crap we have now. Coaches can NOT be successful doing both jobs. Holmgren had it taken away from him when Seattle struggled for the two years he was doing it, and Denver went back to so so football when shanahan was doing it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
The only way Snyder wouldn't get a say is if he promises the world to someone like Bill Polian. It would take tens of millions to get him, and someone of his stature might agree to come here but only if he makes certain that Snyder stays the hell out of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
I gotta say I think Jason should come back. We got to take care of our O Line, Jason shows when he has time he can do good things. I guess I am not patient enough to go through yet another year of "rebuilding".
__________________
F#$% the Cowpukes! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
I don't think Snyder having a say is necessarily a problem but there needs to be a GM in place who Snyder respects and can make Snyder feel involved while at the same time doing it his way.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
i completely disagree he knows dick about football and should have no involvement what so ever, that is way to important to leave to him he needs to sign the checks and that is all, after he has been around the block, like 20 or so years and has some experince then he can have some input, but for now back the f away from team jackass!!!
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Bringing JC back makes sense only if Snyder, Toady or whoever will be in charge carries over the same style Zorn/Lewis/Smith offense...or whatever lol. If we're going to blow things up again (like we did two years ago but Snyder wouldn't call it that) we might as well find a new QB to fit the new coach and system.
But more importantly I'm looking for what Snyder does w/ the FO. The notion that we'll have a smarter, more professional approach to personnel w/ Toady anywhere in the organization borders on insanity. Toady is there for one reason: to be a front man for Snyder's meddling. Snyder wants a new QB...Toady goes looking at Cutler and Sanchez. It's pretty straightforward. Snyder could also bring in a different Toady; however new Toady will be easily recognized. A guy w/ questionable football knowledge and little reputation around the league. This means Snyder still wants to meddle, but wants a new Toady for a pal...one that can articulate sentences such that people don't laugh. The only move that would be "good news" for the future of the franchise is a quality, established football man for a GM who is the clear decision-maker...the rest of it is just rubbish.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Skins fan in the Dallas area
Posts: 187
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Quote:
__________________
We are finally looking like a respectable opponent.....Lets keep it going!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Quote:
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
ZORN has got to go. He is pointing to JC being benched in the KC game as the turning point. He is trying to spin opinions HIS WAY. The turnaround came the second half of the ATL game. He is way off and trying to be a politician. No Zorn, your plan did not work. Sherm Lewis's plan worked. Benching JC caused him to lose his play calling ability.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,538
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Quote:
All our griping about the slow development period seems to fall onto Zorn's shoulders once you listen to his defense/explanations about why FD and ARE are doing what they are doing. And that is the HC responsibility above and beyond playcalling, and because of his defense of the indefensible I would say Zorn needs to go. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
When the Browns talk to Holmgren it's "The Browns are taking decisive action now to make fundamental changes to the organization" When the Redskins talk to Shanahan it's "Dan Snyder has no patience, he's always meddling"
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jurgensen thinks Campbell will be back
Like Bruce Allen
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|