![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
More locally the Giants line was made up of a 4th, 5th, 2 undrafted free agents, and a second round pick. As far as numbers for QB's. Only thing I can tell you is that many of the QB's at the top and bottom were selected in the top 32 (Brees is considered a second round pick by many but today he would have been the last pick of the first round). 4 out of the 5 best QB's in terms of QB rating were top 32 picks and 4 of the bottom 5 were first round picks. Ironically as far as the pro bowl goes, it seems to be a mix of first round picks and UDFA's. Same with QB's. Also worth noting is the last line that Clinton Portis worked with in Denver was made up of a 1st, 4th, 3rd, 7th, and UDFA. Ironically in that group the first round pick might have been the worst of the bunch. My own personal prediction see's us adding a tackle in the first or second round and maybe an interior lineman in the fourth though it would be better if they could add a second tackle. I personally feel like Edwin Williams and Kory Lichtensteiger are going to work out well for our interior. Heck Casey Rabach might have his best season for the first time in a while. The thing we do know right now is that we need two tackles. Maybe for now the best COA would be to add one this year early in the draft and use Levi Jones as a stopgap at RT but theres a lot of time between now and the draft. The most important thing however, as far as O-Line is concerned, could be the creation of a pipeline in which we bring in mid round picks on an annual basis to develop and eventually earn a starting job.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
[QUOTE=53Fan;657734]Well there are 32 starting QB's in the NFL and there are 160 starting o-linemen. They can't all be #1 picks, but teams like the Jets who do have more than 1 on the o-line seem to be doing pretty well and I would certainly give their line more credit than their QB. One of those #1 QB picks is our own JC who we would be replacing because he's.....not good enough?[/QUOTE]
I'll have to give you this one. Most teams thought we reached for JC when most likely he would have been drafted in later rounds if drafted at all. Some teams felt because of where he was from he would have been a UFA. To tell you the truth it wasn't until today that it finally sunk in that this team actually feels totally different to me. If the bus were to pull up today (which I think it has) I'm all at the back of the bus near the toilet... just in case I'm wrong so I can vomit. but I'm on the bus. This year I'm not expecting SB chances, however I do get jealous with the teams that draft QB's then all of a sudden look 110 % better like Atlanta, Baltimore, and Jets. but honestly I'll be satisfied even if we put a 5-11 team on the field so long as there is a sign of improvement on the field, play calling, and clock management. I'm not asking for miracles, just asking for them to look like an NFL team. I found myself feeling sorry for the Raider fans who most likely would give their left nut for Al Davis to either keel over or back off and hire a decent GM and HC and let them run the team knowing that it will take whoever comes in more then a few years to fix the mess he has turned the team into. Whoever or however our team chooses to utilize the draft will be ok with me knowing adiquate minds are at work with a plan on turning this team around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
That's just not accurate. He was a top five QB prospect in that draft at the very very worst. His most common projection was as a second round pick. SI.com - 2005 NFL Draft - Jason Campbell Jason Campbell*|*Auburn,*QB*:*2005 NFL Draft Scout Player Profile Draft Countdown - 2005 Final Mock Draft Ask The Commish.com - Top 2005 NFL Draft Prospects By Position USATODAY.com - Mock 2005 NFL Draft starts with surprise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
My opinion? JC was most likely worthy of a 4,5,or 6th round spot and was majorly coached up. He's definitly a great back up QB. We need a Franchise QB though for the long haul. Hopefully between Dad and Son the Shanahan's can find one where ever they draft him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 416
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Not only was it a reach to take him in the first round it was complete stupidity to give away 3 draft picks to make that reach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice
Quote:
![]() http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-...tml#post429251 I didn't even know we picked up KL until I read your post, see how much I'm paying attention.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|