2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 4)

[mlmdub130]

Originally Posted by SkinsfanNTX

If the Browns want to move up let's do a deal. The fourth and seventh picks in round one have a 300 point difference. We could do this deal if they trade up:

To Cleveland
1st round pick--4th overall (1800 points)

To Washington
1st round pick--7th overall (1500 points)
3rd round pick--71st overall (235 points)
5th round pick--133rd overall (40 points)
6th round pick--167th overall (25 points)

The points in this trade would be identical and the Skins would then have eight picks in the draft:
1) 7th overall
2) 37th overall
3) 71st overall
4) 100rd overall
5) 131st overall
5) 133rd overall
6) 167th overall
7) 195th overall

i might have an accident in my pants if this happens

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by mlmdub130

i might have an accident in my pants if this happens

I honestly feel BA can pull this off with the Bills or Oakland.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

The points may be equal, but I just can't see Holmgren paying 3 extra draft picks to move up 3 spots. Maybe the 1, 3 & either the 5th or 6th.

yeah, or a future pick

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by SkinsfanNTX

If the Browns want to move up let's do a deal. The fourth and seventh picks in round one have a 300 point difference. We could do this deal if they trade up:

To Cleveland
1st round pick--4th overall (1800 points)

To Washington
1st round pick--7th overall (1500 points)
3rd round pick--71st overall (235 points)
5th round pick--133rd overall (40 points)
6th round pick--167th overall (25 points)

The points in this trade would be identical and the Skins would then have eight picks in the draft:
1) 7th overall
2) 37th overall
3) 71st overall
4) 100rd overall
5) 131st overall
5) 133rd overall
6) 167th overall
7) 195th overall

I understand that each pick represents a player, but why settle for low picks? If you don't want just one 2nd round pick, then why not demand both of Cleveland's third round picks (71st and 92nd).

That's 467 points but so what? The question for Cleveland is: "Do you want him or not?". Cleveland has 11 picks in the draft, so they certainly have the capacity to pony up the picks. We could send them a low round pick in the trade if it makes them feel better.

That would give us 5 picks in the top 100 and 7 picks overall.

1) 7th overall
2) 37th overall
3) 71st overall
4) 92nd overall
5) 100th overall
6) 131st overall
7) 195th overall

[SkinsfanNTX]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

I understand that each pick represents a player, but why settle for low picks? If you don't want just one 2nd round pick, then why not demand both of Cleveland's third round picks (71st and 92nd). That would give us 5 picks in the top 100.

That's 467 points but so what? The question for Cleveland is: "Do you want him or not"? Cleveland has 11 picks in the draft, so they certainly have the capacity to pony up the picks. We could send them a low round pick in the trade if it makes them feel better.

Good point...I guess it comes down to how much they want player X and are willing to pay for him. You can squeeze more juice if your guy is there and you got to have him (i.e.-Sanchez to Jets). The other approach is to get more picks to build the belly of your team.

[53Fan]

I would be ecstatic to be able to trade down to #7 and pick up another 2nd or 2 3rds myself.

[ChickenMonkey]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

I would be ecstatic to be able to trade down to #7 and pick up another 2nd or 2 3rds myself.

So with all the hubub about trading down, who would we take at #7 or #9.... OT Anthony Davis, OT Bruce Campbell Or OT Charles Brown....

I Dont much care for Bulaga after watching him against Michigan

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by ChickenMonkey

So with all the hubub about trading down, who would we take at #7 or #9.... OT Anthony Davis, OT Bruce Campbell Or OT Charles Brown....

I Dont much care for Bulaga after watching him against Michigan

That's a good question and as much as I like Okung, I would still rather have more picks. We can still get a quality player at #7 or #9. Plus with the extra 2nd or 3rds, we can fill out even more. There will still be some quality there.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by ChickenMonkey

So with all the hubub about trading down, who would we take at #7 or #9.... OT Anthony Davis, OT Bruce Campbell Or OT Charles Brown....

I Dont much care for Bulaga after watching him against Michigan

OT Trent Williams should also be available.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by ChickenMonkey

So with all the hubub about trading down, who would we take at #7 or #9.... OT Anthony Davis, OT Bruce Campbell Or OT Charles Brown....

I Dont much care for Bulaga after watching him against Michigan

I wouldn't be too hot on drafting Campbell or Brown that early.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

OT Trent Williams should also be available.

Williams reminds me a little of Levi Brown for some reason. I guess because I feel like he'll definitely be good, but not LT good.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

Williams reminds me a little of Levi Brown for some reason. I guess because I feel like he'll definitely be good, but not LT good.

He's RT good and who drafts a RT with a top ten pick?

[DIRTEE]

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

He's RT good and who drafts a RT with a top ten pick?

Someone with a left handed QB

[SkinsfanNTX]

Originally Posted by DIRTEE

Someone with a left handed QB

Tebow?

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by DIRTEE

Someone with a left handed QB

I'd still draft the best LT and play him at RT if this was the case.