![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,012
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
I didn't ask the question, I merely answered it as it was asked. |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#47 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,012
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Okung would easily be our best tackle if drafted today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
And you must have missed me saying more than once "I do not want te Redskins to draft him", doesn't mean I don't think he'll make a decent starter someday. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
As would any of the tackles projected to go in the first two rounds of the draft today.
When Stephon Heyer is the best tackle on your team, then something is clearly wrong. OT is by far the most pressing need on our team right now. We need atleast 2, and preferably three, tackles better than Heyer on this team by the start of the season. EDIT: An argument could easily be made that Hicks is the best Tackle on our team. However, i havent heard him officially be spoken of as anything other than a starting RG or backup T/G.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Absolutely. Our o-line would be upgraded with that one pick alone.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
When did LT's become such a vouge pick. It seemed like back in the 80's a guy like Okung might have lasted to till the back end of round 1.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Quote:
In my eyes on a scale of 1 to 10 in importance I got QB at 10 and LT at 6-7. The more i think about it, the mro eI feel that Gaither for our 37th would be a perfect trade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Its just how the talent stacked this year. It is easier at this time to project Suh and Okung have enough talent and play at positions where they will play right away... and make difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
When offensive lines play like ours did in 2009, drafting a tackle is super vogue.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
Tebow, the best Qb out the draft. SEC rules!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,012
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
I just glanced through the draft results in the 80s and nearly every year there were tackles taken in the top 5, top 10, top 15, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
The amount of utility the QB provides to the team is not infinite and is not unaffected by the dudes around him.
And besides, who would make a big transaction without some sort of insurance? Having an LT is a good insurance policy for a QB, especially one that's commanding top 4 money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
|
Re: Tebow - More Upside than Downside for a franchise......
I like Tebow in alot of was and do think that his intangibles will make him sucessful. Regardless of what analyst (and us fans) think, it's impossible to measure how much a guy wants it. If you get a guy who is willing to give up his life (in a work ethic sense) to achieve something, I'll bet on that guy every time.
However, we are not taking him 4th overall and I doubt he falls to us when we pick in the 2nd round. I hope, and believe, that Tebow will have success at the NFL level if he goes to the right situation. That being said, I would love to get the winningest QB in college history with our 2nd round pick.....Colt McCoy.
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|