![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
Probably more likely to keep Backus at LT now. Not for sure though
And I still think Trent Williams has the slight edge over Okung for us even if both are available.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
Have we talked to Williams at all? Just curious.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
so you would see us going w/Williams at 4? He should be around later than that I would think if they can trade back.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
I wonder what the likelihood would be of trading down and getting two first round picks instead of Okung? We could pick up two OL that way since we have limited picks in the draft after the McNabb deal.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
Quote:
I hope shanny and Bruce are listening to these boards. If not Okung, then the above seems the best route to go. But if we acquire even 1 additional pick before the 3rd, I think we should just take Okung at #4, and go BPA for the acquired pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: 2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 5)
Quote:
Williams has several possible red flags. I don't get it? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|