Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

vallin21 · 05-01-2010, 07:21 AM

A B- is about right, considering they got Mcnabb, Williams, Carriker, and a steal in Capers. I still think Perry Riley was a reach, and would've been available in the 6th (he was kinda shocked he got drafted that high). I thought a FS or RT were more pressing needs considering Rocky wasn't traded and that we have no true starter at both RT and FS, but I think Austin is a poor man's D-Jackson, and Morris might be on the field WK 1, so Shanahan/ Allen made up for it in the late rounds, but Riley IMO was not even the best avilable LB on the board.

View Poll Results: Grade the Redskins 2010 draft class
A	14	8.14%
B	97	56.40%
C	54	31.40%
D	4	2.33%
F	3	1.74%
Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

05-01-2010, 07:21 AM	#28
vallin21 The Starter Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,198	Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis A B- is about right, considering they got Mcnabb, Williams, Carriker, and a steal in Capers. I still think Perry Riley was a reach, and would've been available in the 6th (he was kinda shocked he got drafted that high). I thought a FS or RT were more pressing needs considering Rocky wasn't traded and that we have no true starter at both RT and FS, but I think Austin is a poor man's D-Jackson, and Morris might be on the field WK 1, so Shanahan/ Allen made up for it in the late rounds, but Riley IMO was not even the best avilable LB on the board.

Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Locker Room Main Forum