(Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

On the Cowboys board I look at, there is a thread about ranking WR corps, oddly there is not one about ranking OL. I think it's clear that our WR's are not the tops, but I think they will make it through the season, if we are unable to bring someone in. But, lets not forget where our priority HAD to be this offseason. Everyone living knew we had to upgrade our OL, and we did, to the point where it is most likely a strength and one of the better ones in the division. Let's see if we can have that same EFFECTIVE focus over the next year on WR's.

Depth on the OL is still cause for concern in the event we suffer an injury or two. That's a problem many teams experience, mainly because of the scarcity of players deemed to be good depth players. If a player is good enought to step right in if an injury occurs and the line dosen't miss a beat in execution, then usually that kind of player generally feels he's good enough to start for some team in the league and will in most cases find a location where he can be a starter.

It can be argued that the WR's we have can be productive providing no one of them in particular be counted on to carry the maximum load. Couple the WR's with the TE's and spread the wealth equally among the lot, this could ultimately prove to be a formidable group. To expect any one of the group to catch 90-100 balls would be an unrealistic expectation.