Republicans meet Jan Brewer Governor of Arizona

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

What exactly is the problem? If you Americans are going to talk about human rights, want to hold others accountable and open to inspection then you got to play ball when it's your turn.


I tell ya, a Republican president should have withdrawn us from the UN a long time ago...then we wouldn't have to file report with them.

FM

The problem is the president is the one turning in AZ and its not the UN who decided to take this on. We have our government and laws to work this out and because Obama knows this law has public support he decides to bring in the UN. What a weak man who cannot fight his own battle. Also to take the UN Human Right Council serious is a joke when Lybia and Cuba sit on that council.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by firstdown

The problem is the president is the one turning in AZ and its not the UN who decided to take this on. We have our government and laws to work this out and because Obama knows this law has public support he decides to bring in the UN. What a weak man who cannot fight his own battle. Also to take the UN Human Right Council serious is a joke when Lybia and Cuba sit on that council.

Turning in? WTF is this? High school?


It's a good think we no longer condone/export torture because we would fit right in with Cuba and Libya. Praise the Lord [Obama]!

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

Turning in? WTF is this? High school?


It's a good think we no longer condone/export torture because we would fit right in with Cuba and Libya. Praise the Lord [Obama]!

Yea thats my point.

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by firstdown

The problem is the president is the one turning in AZ and its not the UN who decided to take this on. We have our government and laws to work this out and because Obama knows this law has public support he decides to bring in the UN. What a weak man who cannot fight his own battle. Also to take the UN Human Right Council serious is a joke when Lybia and Cuba sit on that council.

Public support has nothing to do with protecting the Constitution.

Period.

That is one of the ways that we protect minorities in this great country.

That Arizona law was straight up illegal.

I don't mind that the people of Arizona were frustrated with the government for sweeping this issue under the rug for decades so why not do something crazy to bring attention to the problem, but that law was a ****ing joke.

Back on subject.

Jan Brewer is quite possibly a crook who also happens to be a grade A moron.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

Public support has nothing to do with protecting the Constitution.

Period.

That is one of the ways that we protect minorities in this great country.

That Arizona law was straight up illegal.

I don't mind that the people of Arizona were frustrated with the government for sweeping this issue under the rug for decades so why not do something crazy to bring attention to the problem, but that law was a ****ing joke.

Back on subject.

Jan Brewer is quite possibly a crook who also happens to be a grade A moron.

Well thats fine if the law is illegal but we have procedures here which Obama can use which is fine by me. It getting the UN involved I have a problem with. To me it looks like he knos the AZ bill was popular so he is pushing this off on the UN.

How is Jan Brewer a crook?

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by firstdown

How is Jan Brewer a crook?

A local CBS affiliate down in Arizona has been investigating her for months over the fact that two people in Brewer's inner circle including her campaign manager work for a huge prison company down there.

That prison company would stand to make a ton of money if the ridiculous Arizona law were to ever go into effect.

She was so pissed that this CBS station was looking into this outrageous conflict of interest that she pulled all of her campaign ads from that particular station.

Brewer is bad bad news. And of course she is an imbecile and shouldn't have anything to do with running an entire State.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

A local CBS affiliate down in Arizona has been investigating her for months over the fact that two people in Brewer's inner circle including her campaign manager work for a huge prison company down there.

That prison company would stand to make a ton of money if the ridiculous Arizona law were to ever go into effect.

She was so pissed that this CBS station was looking into this outrageous conflict of interest that she pulled all of her campaign ads from that particular station.

Brewer is bad bad news. And of course she is an imbecile and shouldn't have anything to do with running an entire State.

I guess you have never owned a business. If someone or organization was coming after me/my business why the hell would I spend my advertising money with them? So you really have nothing on her but you just don't like her politics.

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by firstdown

So you really have nothing on her but you just don't like her politics.

The fact that she is dumb as a bag of wrenches and signed that ridiculous unconstitutional law which conveniently makes lots and lots of money for her closest advisors(have you ever heard of political corruption... it's a crime ya know?) might also have something to do with it.

Or is idiotic behavior and fraud an integral part of your business plan as well?

I didn't think so.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

The fact that she is dumb as a bag of wrenches and signed that ridiculous unconstitutional law which conveniently makes lots and lots of money for her closest advisors(have you ever heard of political corruption... it's a crime ya know?) might also have something to do with it.

Or is idiotic behavior and fraud an integral part of your business plan as well?

I didn't think so.

I agree that she is not the sharpest tack. I agree that the law appears unconstitutional. But, before you go calling corruption, show me where these guys intentionally proposed the law with the intent to profit. Stupidity is not a crime or half this board would be in jail.

Perhaps, as it was passed by a referendum and not in some back room, the law was a popular reaction to ineffective federal enforcement of the federal law which this "ridiculous" State law mirrors. Further, b/c the prisons in question currently are used to house federal detainees being held for illegal immigration, wouldn't her "cronies" profit equally if the Feds actually enforced the existing laws? Just b/c a media outlet saw a possible connection does not create an actual connection. Was there a failure to disclose the lobbying connections on the individuals mandatory disclosure forms? Has anyone even looked at these forms? Show me the evidence of fraud. Where has someone lied about their possible profit?

Do you understand why the State law is unconstitional? Or are you now going to look that up?