Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


V. Jackson "Prepared to Sit out season"

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-17-2010, 12:25 PM   #11
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: V. Jackson "Prepared to Sit out season"

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
so if we could do a 3 way trade which partner would be the best fit:
The parameters would be this:
the skins send a 5th to SD, AH to trading partner : Skins get VJ,
trading partner sends their 2nd to SD. : Gets AH
one option:maybe the Skins 5th goes to the trading partner and SD gets the trading partner's 6th

Tennessee
Houston (deal would have to be after this weekend's game I expect)
NYJ

Could this type deal happen, and which partner makes the most sense?
I'm not cutting on you but some people have weird trade thoughts. I would presume the Skins would be trying to hook up with a team that runs the 4-3 and needs a DT in order to make AH happy and his new team. Thats if Tenn bails on us. Why would we send AH to any other team running a 3-4 knowing AH will not be happy and will stir the pot, and why would any team running the 3-4 like us want to pick him up knowing AH does not want to play in it?

So I'm guessing the Jets would not be our trading partner, or anyone else who utilizes the 3-4.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.06190 seconds with 11 queries