8th Circuit Court Grants Stay, Lockout Continues

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

I can for some reason see the owners pointing this out talking about how some fans failed to renew their tickets because of not knowing what was going to happen with the lockout... basically causing damage.

It's about as retarded as a robber suing a home owner for a faulty window that broke and cut him while he was trying to break into the house.

Doesn't make sense does it? Didn't think so.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

It's about as retarded as a robber suing a home owner for a faulty window that broke and cut him while he was trying to break into the house.

Doesn't make sense does it? Didn't think so.

But... stupid itshay like this does happen. I hear all the time about husbands filing suit against the wife because by doing so they can get paid by the home owners insurance. How about a robber who files suit against the home owner after the home owner shoots the robber? Better yet the home owner getting arrested because the robber was shot in the back leaving the residence and killed?

But I still think you gave a bad example. A better example would be had you not been drinking and driving then you might have had control of your vehicle and not ran the oncoming vehicle off the road injuring one passenger or both. It's all about the first event. Had the players not filed their intent then the owners would not have locked out. All the revenue lost could be attributed to the players filing their intent.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Had the players not filed their intent then the owners would not have locked out. All the revenue lost could be attributed to the players filing their intent.

DOT DOT DOT


The first incident in this is the Owners opting out of the CBA. You conveniently forgot the most important detail. They are the cause, not the players bro.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

DOT DOT DOT


The first incident in this is the Owners opting out of the CBA. You conveniently forgot the most important detail. They are the cause, not the players bro.

I think your forgetting that although most of us know the owners were opting out, the CBA didn't expire prior to the intent? Last I remember there was agreed upon extensions in order to work out a deal, 6 hrs prior to the CBA expiring the Union filed their intent or decertified. It doesn't matter what we think would have happened it's a matter of what actually happened. The players decertified 6 hrs prior to the deadline. So the first event was the players fault not the owners, even though we all can guess had the CBA expired with out an agreement we all could blame both sides for not getting it done. Then had the owners locked out we could point the finger at the owners as being the first event.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

The players decertified 6 hrs prior to the deadline. So the first event was the players fault not the owners

How you can't comprehend this is beyond me. Really, I'm dumbfounded how you are still saying the first event was the players fault when clearly the first event happened 2 years ago with the opting out of the CBA.


At this point, you aren't even being remotely logical or sticking to the facts. You are just using portions of the events to fill in your stance supporting the owners.


Courts close at 5pm bro. I know there was a show called "Night Court", but none exist that i know of.