![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Dolphins)
Quote:
I truly believe that that solely relying on a ZB running scheme can only work if you have a top 5 QB, otherwise defenses will consistently beat you in the redzone and short yardage situations. Unfortunately finding and developing a guy into a top 5 QB is a rare and long process. I also think the change from the 4-3 to 3-4 was a much bigger issue then people generally acknowledge, primarily because of the opportunity cost associated with making the switch; the entire rest of the team was put on hold and possible even set back to fix something that wasn’t broken. “Fixing” the d was a luxury that we wernt in the position to have. But to me it’s less the coaching staff and more the current philosophy, maybe those are one in the same but I think philosophy can change and that’s why I see room for improvement. And imagine if we brought in a new coaching staff that wanted to change the d back to a 4-3 base and do entirely away with the ZB system, we would be just as bad in 2 years as we are now, maybe worse. So now that we wasted 2 years on fixing our D I think we can put less effort in upgrading it and focus on the offense a little. Id also love to go to a partial ZB scheme that incorporated plays suited for short yardage situations, but most importantly id like to see our coaches become more adaptive and less uncompromising in their philosophies.
__________________
Last edited by mlmpetert; 11-14-2011 at 04:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|