grade

Gmanc711 · 04-22-2004, 09:57 AM

Easy A just for the coaching. I honestly think with the right coaching staff last year, we are proboly a playoff team or close too it. We have made some major upgrades at some positions. I still think the D-line could have had more done to it, but we defintley upgraded a little bit. The coaching alone should make us about 3 games better, minimum.

SkinsRock · 04-22-2004, 10:08 AM

A Two words: Joe Gibbs....and most of the other pick-ups haven't been too shabby either.

hi-jinx · 04-22-2004, 06:03 PM

B (maybe B-) but lets see the draft
Gibbs ofcourse is huge, but it only for 3-4 seasons right?
I am unsure how well Portis will do under the Gibbs system, I think Dillon would have been a better pick and cost less.
I am not a big believer in Brunel either but I think he will be good enough.
I think "something" needs to happen with Sameuls, he has us cap strapped
And we really overpaid for Lavar, yes hes good but hasn't been that good for this kinda payday(this will hurt us down the road)

SmootSmack · 04-22-2004, 06:14 PM

Not sure I would agree that Dillon would be a better pick than Portis

And as for Gibbs being around for just 3-4 years who would have though we'd ever get him back for even that long. Besides 3 years is a big deal. Might have another Super Bowl title by then. Imagine if we took away three seasons of Gibbs first tenure, let's say the 1982, 1987, and 1991 seasons

SkinsRock · 04-23-2004, 09:15 AM

In Gibbs first tenure, he went to the superbowl twice in his first three years and won one....not too shabby! I'll take that again...even if it does mean losing the SB once...the best team in our division hasn't even been able to get there three year in a row...

04-22-2004, 06:14 PM	#4
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Not sure I would agree that Dillon would be a better pick than Portis And as for Gibbs being around for just 3-4 years who would have though we'd ever get him back for even that long. Besides 3 years is a big deal. Might have another Super Bowl title by then. Imagine if we took away three seasons of Gibbs first tenure, let's say the 1982, 1987, and 1991 seasons __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

04-22-2004, 09:57 AM	#1
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 40 Posts: 7,506	Easy A just for the coaching. I honestly think with the right coaching staff last year, we are proboly a playoff team or close too it. We have made some major upgrades at some positions. I still think the D-line could have had more done to it, but we defintley upgraded a little bit. The coaching alone should make us about 3 games better, minimum.

04-22-2004, 10:08 AM	#2
SkinsRock Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 56 Posts: 907	A Two words: Joe Gibbs....and most of the other pick-ups haven't been too shabby either.

04-22-2004, 06:03 PM	#3
hi-jinx Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Memphis Age: 50 Posts: 180	B (maybe B-) but lets see the draft Gibbs ofcourse is huge, but it only for 3-4 seasons right? I am unsure how well Portis will do under the Gibbs system, I think Dillon would have been a better pick and cost less. I am not a big believer in Brunel either but I think he will be good enough. I think "something" needs to happen with Sameuls, he has us cap strapped And we really overpaid for Lavar, yes hes good but hasn't been that good for this kinda payday(this will hurt us down the road)

04-23-2004, 09:15 AM	#5
SkinsRock Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 56 Posts: 907	In Gibbs first tenure, he went to the superbowl twice in his first three years and won one....not too shabby! I'll take that again...even if it does mean losing the SB once...the best team in our division hasn't even been able to get there three year in a row...

grade

Locker Room Main Forum