Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Run Blocking & Wide Receivers

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-26-2005, 01:11 AM   #4
aprius
Camp Scrub
 
aprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Call it Frisco....I am originally from DC
Posts: 56
Re: Run Blocking & Wide Receivers

Dyson and Gardener are very good blockers.
Thrash is good.
The rest are question marks.
Patten is known as a good ST guy but I dont know if that is for blocking or his speed and return ability.
I hope we keep Gardener and Dyson and dump McCants and Thrash.
With Dyson and Gardener we have 2 big men that can block and spread the field out and that are good route runners.
With Moss, Patten, Brown and Jacobs we have guys that can create separation, catch up to any pass and motor down the field.
Good balance of brawn and speed.
If you double team one guy you will be beat by another.
No win propsition for everybody else.
It gives me alot more confidence in our passing game.
Last year everyone knew if you shut down Coles the Skins were in trouble.
This year try to shut down Patten, Moss, Dyson, Gardener, Brown and Jacobs....go ahead just double team all 5....Portis and Betts will run over you....And I hate to mention Cooley...and Nemo and Baber and White and...oops! I forgot the defense....But no other team will...
__________________
Hail Redskins!
aprius is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.39461 seconds with 11 queries