![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Griffin's impact on the off-season FA/draft
Quote:
But, even if they were actual scouts doesn't mean that scouts grade are correct. All you're doing is listening to the media scouts you like and turning a blind ear to the media scouts you don't agree with (Cosell, Hodge). Your actually turning a blind ear to some former NFL coaches and one of most well respected GM/scouts in the league in Tony Dungy and Gil Brandt. False media scouting can lead to the perception of certain players as 'reaches' like Jake Locker even though it much more likely that actual team scouts rated Locker as the No.2 prospect behind Cam Newton all along. And speaking of Cam Newton, he's a prime example of how wrong media scouting can be. The media scouts tried to sell Blaine Gabbert as the no.1 QB and did a good job of selling Newton as an unworthy no.1 overall pick. Good thing the actual scouts for the Panthers did their homework and got it right. And I have a hard time believing that actual team scouts would rate Andrew Luck ahead of Cam Newton. Andrew Luck's main attribute that would make him the no.1 prospect is a coachable intangible and many GM's say you draft for tangibles. The theory is that you can coach/teach a Griffin or a Locker or a Newton to close the gap and equal if not surpass Luck the execution of a pro-style offense (which is his cheif advantage as a prospect) but you can't coach/teach Luck to have thier elite arm strength or elite athleticism. Quote:
But, lets not act like Griffin skillset is so far away from Luck to preclude an honest discussion about which QB is no.1 |
||
|
|
|
|