Trayvon Martin Case

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

As for RR's -- despite the fact that none have existed to date, fundamental to his argument is the belief that an "unbiased programmer" can exist who will create a system to govern humanity better then the we poor, backward and deeply flawed luddites could ever hope to do.

Why would we use one programmer? The system would be inherently flawed. We would use a consortium that had no larger picture of the end product that would enable them to game the system. Your argument is invalid.

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

In accepting this as a truism, RR demonstrates faith in a being whose existence he cannot prove and in whom he will entrust the judgment of life and death over humans.

I do not accept that as a truism, it's just your weak attempt to frame an argument I'm not making in order to weaken my argument.

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

A man of such deep and unprovable faith cannot be convinced of the fallacy of said faith.

Oh, like religious types? Ok, gotcha!