|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-01-2007, 12:53 AM | #16 | |
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
08-01-2007, 12:58 AM | #17 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
|
08-01-2007, 01:43 AM | #18 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
08-01-2007, 01:48 AM | #19 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Yeah because he is a better "reciever."
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
08-01-2007, 02:17 AM | #20 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DC area
Posts: 374
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
Brandon is more physically gifted than ARE and rightfully should be the #2 receiver, both on the depth chart and by the numbers. I think it's a problem when your #2 receiver is the tight end. I'm taking nothing away from Chris Cooley who is a better receiver then either BL or ARE. It's just that the top two receivers by catches, yards and TDs should be your wideouts. For the team's sake, I hope Lloyd is successful this year, but I don't have my hopes up. |
|
08-01-2007, 08:32 AM | #21 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
I usually side with the majority opinion but it looks I'm in the minority when it comes to Lloyd. I like him a lot. I love the fiery, cocky attitude. I think he uses it to motivate him to make plays. Lloyd follows in the mold of Gary Clark. Not everyone can be like Art Monk. In fact, as far as receivers and ego...um...go, Monk seems to have been an aberration. As long as he stays out of trouble with the law, I will root for him to compete with Santanna for the #1 role.
I also think it's kind of silly to say "Lloyd's not a #2" due to to last year's performance when everyone's performance last year was subpar. With that line of thinking we don't any first stringers.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
08-01-2007, 09:04 AM | #22 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
i think I'm in the minority when it comes to Lloyd, too. nothing wrong with alittle swagger. i don't remember Lloyd dropping any balls last season. it was just Brunell wouldn't throw to him. should be different this year
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
08-01-2007, 09:05 AM | #23 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
it seems like there are alot of people around here that are infatuated with Thrash. the guy is a good team player. no more, no less
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
08-01-2007, 09:06 AM | #24 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Based on how last year ended ARE should be listed ahead of Lloyd. Lloyd has a lot to prove right now.
|
08-01-2007, 09:50 AM | #25 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beaufort SC
Age: 45
Posts: 933
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
I really don't think that either is a strong # 2 guy from what we say last year. I hope that at least one of them took last year to heart, and went home and had a long talk in front of a mirror. We need to have a strong guy this year other than Moss.
__________________
We are always superbowl contenders in March!!! HTTR!!!!!!!! |
08-01-2007, 10:50 AM | #26 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,319
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
I was listening to Gibbs presser the other day and the way he talks about BL you would think he was Gary Clark. Gibbs always says he is real talented, he is real graceful catching the ball, has all this ability. I even read that he and Springs trained together in Ariz and Springs was saying the same stuff. I mean Springs said that Lloyd was one of the most talented WR's he had ever been around. Now that's a bold statement.
So why doesn't all this ability transfer to the field?? Yes, you can blame some of it on Brunell, but that only goes so far. Plus he never did shit in SF. I'm looking for this guy to really take off this year. I'm talking about 60-80 catches and 6-8 TD's. He needs to put up or shut up and go away. |
08-01-2007, 10:54 AM | #27 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,319
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
ARE is a nice player but he is not a solid NFL #2 WR. If our offense is going to improve and go to the next level we are going to need Lloyd to play like he is capable of playing.
|
08-01-2007, 10:58 AM | #28 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Antwaan burned shawn springs yesterday. ARE had to dive down for the catch and might not have caught it. I think the ref might of said no catch but i had a better look at it than even the ref did and it looked good. Maybe out of bounds but ARE caught it. Shawn turned around indicating no catch with his hands. Small tidbit from camp, thats all.
|
08-01-2007, 11:53 AM | #29 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
|
|
08-01-2007, 12:00 PM | #30 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
|
Re: ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot
Quote:
Like I said, he has a lot to prove right now. |
|
|
|