03-07-2007, 05:00 PM | #31 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 50
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Who cares if a player plays for money.
Is anyone under the illusion that he'd somehow play less hard because he got paid? Stupidest thing I ever heard,, somehow he's less motivated because a team coughed up the cash for him? Someone should clue Don Banks in as to what a 'professional" is. ~Bang
__________________
Joe Jacoby for the Hall of Fame! |
Advertisements |
03-07-2007, 05:09 PM | #32 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Right. Does he think he's going to get paid AGAIN if he decides to slack off? I would think not.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
03-07-2007, 05:11 PM | #33 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Not only that, teams can cut them without any guaranteed money besides the signing bonus. If you screw around, you get cut, no more money, game over.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
03-07-2007, 05:25 PM | #34 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
They play the same defense, and, let's see, M. Washington, Shawn Taylor, C. Griffin - he played with several of the same starters. As for not hearing of any other offers - we'll get the memo circulated that offers must first be submitted to Offiss for proper scrutiny.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
03-07-2007, 05:42 PM | #35 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 54
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Fred Smoot
When I first heard cornerback Fred Smoot was signing with Washington, I thought this might be another instance of the Redskins' front office overpaying for a player whose performance levels don't match his reputation. For more see espn.com Last edited by SmootSmack; 03-07-2007 at 05:44 PM. Reason: Sorry we can't post full Insider articles here |
03-07-2007, 05:46 PM | #36 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Smoot is definitely not a #1 CB, but he is a great #2 or #3, therefore I think Smoot will do fine in his second stint as a Redskin.
|
03-07-2007, 06:10 PM | #37 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2007, 06:53 PM | #38 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 239
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2007, 07:00 PM | #39 | |
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
|
03-07-2007, 07:27 PM | #40 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
|
|
03-08-2007, 10:03 AM | #41 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
I think this offseason so far has shown the front office is learning from past mistakes. It certainly hasn't been a typical Redskins offseason that's for sure.
|
03-08-2007, 10:21 AM | #42 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BillysBurg, Va.
Posts: 489
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
I agree matty. This year is actually quite refreshing. I like everything we have done so far. I like the approach and effort from the front office to not screw up. I too believe they have learned valueable lessons from past mistakes and are willing to be patient and selective. I have to be honest though, I can see how people outside redskin nation have viewed us in the past, as I sit and watch all these other teams throw BIG money at undeserving players.
|
03-08-2007, 10:51 AM | #43 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
I don't lose any more sleep over what non-Redskins fans think of the Redskins than I do over what other countries think of the United States. Who cares what ESPN or France think? Certainly not me. There is only one team that had a successful season last year and that was the Colts. Do you think Chargers fans feel like they accomplished anything? Or Patriots fans? The Philadelphia Eagles, who are treated in the press like the Yankees of the 1950s, have never won a Super Bowl. At the end of the day (and this is just me) the Eagles have been no more successful than the Skins over the last ten years because they haven't won anything. Also, there are certain things you have to do well to win it all and on some of those things, the Redskins are miles ahead of teams that had better records last year or went to the playoffs. If we keep our heads in the draft and don't have any big injuries, I believe we will be a threat. All of that to say I agree that we have been smarter this off-season, so far. If Ladell Betts ends up somewhere else, we'll be right back to square one. This Shanahan fellow worries me. I'm not convinced a blockbuster deal would serve us that well. I think we can pick up draft picks without taking on Bly. I would prefer to pacify Springs and have him instead. If he's healthy, he's a great football player. Denver always seems to bleed that extra concession from us. They always get the extra little perk that swings the deal in their favor.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
03-08-2007, 11:35 AM | #44 | |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
03-08-2007, 12:27 PM | #45 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Insider info on Smoot from ESPN
Quote:
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|