Chemistry can't be bought

#56fanatic · 10-17-2006, 01:46 PM

you know, I feel a little different than most when it comes to blaming Danny. I dont think he has played one snap, or coached one play (at least not since 2000) The coaches he has had in the past and present let him know what they need or want to win. He goes out and gets them. He gives our coaches the tools to win. How someone can blame a guy who writes the checks for a teams lousy play is beyond me. If the guy didn't spend the money, he would be critisized too. He can't win with most people. I did blame him for the debacle with the fantasy team he tried to create when he bought the team. but, Marty felt he had a good enough team to compete, so he didnt spend. Spurrier wanted quick players, so he went and go the players he wanted. Gibbs wanted certain players and wanted to get rid of certain players, that is what has happened. what ever Joe wants, Joe is going to get. Maybe dan can say no once in a while, but the chemistry thing can be put on the owner. Its up to the coaches and "core redskins" to promote that chemistry. What you can blame snyder for was firing and hiring coaches like he did. but not now. this falls squarely on the coaches and players.

PoundIt · 10-17-2006, 01:59 PM

No. Youre right. The age thing is not the factor it was. Springs is getting up there, being an injury prone 31. Big Joe is only 31. Some of our linemen are into their 30's. Arch looks like an old 28, maybe he just sucks. Maybe the point should not be as much about age as it should be about lack of chemistry.

Hog1 · 10-17-2006, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hesscl34

You fucking suck Southpaw... you can't be a fan if we win OR lose, and when you lose you are a REALLY bad fan.

Amen, sister!
IMO, I don't see Joe trying to "buy chemistry". I see him trying to buy (unless we can get them to play for free) some alleged talented youngish FA's that can co-exist to accelerate the growth process whereby we win the SB quicker rather than longer. While it may seem unconventional, it does not mean it won't work. It hasn't yet. After all, there are 32 teams in the league, 31 of which employ the, build through the draft models. For 20+ it isn't working.

If you always do, what you have always done, you will always get what you have always gotten-Aristot?..........arastotel?.........Ary.......... .Plato!

Southpaw · 10-17-2006, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

Amen, sister!
IMO, I don't see Joe trying to "buy chemistry". I see him trying to buy (unless we can get them to play for free) some alleged talented youngish FA's that can co-exist to accelerate the growth process whereby we win the SB quicker rather than longer. While it may seem unconventional, it does not mean it won't work. It hasn't yet. After all, there are 32 teams in the league, 31 of which employ the, build through the draft models. For 20+ it isn't working.

If you always do, what you have always done, you will always get what you have always gotten-Aristot?..........arastotel?.........Ary.......... .Plato!

I can respect your argument because you actually presented a thoughtful opinion, but what was the point of quoting hess's little "real fan" tantrum?

Hog1 · 10-17-2006, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Southpaw

I can respect your argument because you actually presented a thoughtful opinion, but what was the point of quoting hess's little "real fan" tantrum?

Regrets...I get a little carried away sometimes!

10-17-2006, 01:46 PM	#46
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 50 Posts: 1,801	Re: Chemistry can't be bought you know, I feel a little different than most when it comes to blaming Danny. I dont think he has played one snap, or coached one play (at least not since 2000) The coaches he has had in the past and present let him know what they need or want to win. He goes out and gets them. He gives our coaches the tools to win. How someone can blame a guy who writes the checks for a teams lousy play is beyond me. If the guy didn't spend the money, he would be critisized too. He can't win with most people. I did blame him for the debacle with the fantasy team he tried to create when he bought the team. but, Marty felt he had a good enough team to compete, so he didnt spend. Spurrier wanted quick players, so he went and go the players he wanted. Gibbs wanted certain players and wanted to get rid of certain players, that is what has happened. what ever Joe wants, Joe is going to get. Maybe dan can say no once in a while, but the chemistry thing can be put on the owner. Its up to the coaches and "core redskins" to promote that chemistry. What you can blame snyder for was firing and hiring coaches like he did. but not now. this falls squarely on the coaches and players.

10-17-2006, 01:59 PM	#47
PoundIt Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Manchester, MD Age: 55 Posts: 8	Re: Chemistry can't be bought No. Youre right. The age thing is not the factor it was. Springs is getting up there, being an injury prone 31. Big Joe is only 31. Some of our linemen are into their 30's. Arch looks like an old 28, maybe he just sucks. Maybe the point should not be as much about age as it should be about lack of chemistry.

Chemistry can't be bought

Locker Room Main Forum