Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2009, 12:32 AM   #46
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Kind of surprised about all the interest over Matt. Nothing personal but I could give two-shits where he plays next year. The only thing I ever think about hearing his name is the insane hit Smoot put on him in last year's playoff game. Hasselback's leg was a giant bruise (he looked pathetic against Green Bay the next week). Fond memory of Smoot... maybe he deserves another year. As nickel? And he has to practice more or something, i don't know but i get the feeling Smoot parties his arse off.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-07-2009, 03:57 AM   #47
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

A healthy MH would be an improvement in places like Minny, Chicago, and Detroit. Seattle is getting a new head coach, so who knows what direction Mora Jr. will go. I think MH would be serviceable here as a back up and nothing else, a more talented Todd Collins.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 08:31 AM   #48
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

So Ruskell said yesterday that Hasselbeck isn't going anywhere
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 10:18 AM   #49
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

thank god. we have enough old heads on this team
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 10:44 AM   #50
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
He still has some quality years left in him as a starter, not sure that he would want to come here as a backup.
If he comes here and there is fair open competition for starting QB then he will be the starter. He's a proven pro bowl QB that still has a bunch of good years in front of him. He's not Bruenell who was obviously finished when the Skins picked him up. JC hasnt really shown anything and its still not clear he ever will. That said, I'm not sure the Skins should sign him. For some reason it really bothers me that the Skins cant draft and develop their own players and always have to rely on FAs to attempt to bolster the team. This method isnt working and successful teams dont really do it that way.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 11:34 AM   #51
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
If he comes here and there is fair open competition for starting QB then he will be the starter. He's a proven pro bowl QB that still has a bunch of good years in front of him. He's not Bruenell who was obviously finished when the Skins picked him up. JC hasnt really shown anything and its still not clear he ever will. That said, I'm not sure the Skins should sign him. For some reason it really bothers me that the Skins cant draft and develop their own players and always have to rely on FAs to attempt to bolster the team. This method isnt working and successful teams dont really do it that way.
Wait, exactly how isn't he any different from Brunell when he came here?

That's actually a really good comparison that never really crossed my mind. So, thanks, I guess.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 12:21 PM   #52
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Wait, exactly how isn't he any different from Brunell when he came here?

That's actually a really good comparison that never really crossed my mind. So, thanks, I guess.
MHs arm still works, MBs didnt.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 12:24 PM   #53
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
MHs arm still works, MBs didnt.
Unfotunaley, MH's back doesn't work.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 12:26 PM   #54
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
MHs arm still works, MBs didnt.
I think there was a year (2004) where Brunell was playing through an arm injury, and then he hurt his knee late in 2005, but I don't see where his arm just stopped working. I mean, even this year in the preseason for NO, he's still got a lot of zip on the ball.

He started 37 games here, including the 2005 playoffs, and very rarely was a lack of arm strength ever an issue, if I remember correctly. Last I remember the guy was setting completion records while Brandon Lloyd was on the field running God-knows-what.

And yeah, isn't Hasselbeck's back injury every bit as bad as whatever Brunell had that forced him out of Jacksonville (Leftwich-itis?)
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 12:56 PM   #55
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think there was a year (2004) where Brunell was playing through an arm injury, and then he hurt his knee late in 2005, but I don't see where his arm just stopped working. I mean, even this year in the preseason for NO, he's still got a lot of zip on the ball.

He started 37 games here, including the 2005 playoffs, and very rarely was a lack of arm strength ever an issue, if I remember correctly. Last I remember the guy was setting completion records while Brandon Lloyd was on the field running God-knows-what.

And yeah, isn't Hasselbeck's back injury every bit as bad as whatever Brunell had that forced him out of Jacksonville (Leftwich-itis?)
MB never threw the ball more than 5 yds. I'm sure almost anybody can zip a 5 yd pass. Like I said, I dont think the Skins should sign MH. He's not the answer to the Skins problems at QB.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 01:00 PM   #56
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
MB never threw the ball more than 5 yds. I'm sure almost anybody can zip a 5 yd pass. Like I said, I dont think the Skins should sign MH. He's not the answer at QB.
I think you and I have a different definition of 'never', or perhaps '5 yards' but either way, it's still somewhat dumb to use the absence of an event for proof of the contrary.

But yeah, I see Hasselbeck as a guy in decline, and he can probably hang on for 5 more years in the NFL, but I don't think he'll play like he did in 2005 anytime in the near future. Perhaps in a more powerful offense, he could be successful.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 01:03 PM   #57
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,452
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

all the back and forth makes me think MH would be the perfect backup in DALLAS!!!!
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:31 PM   #58
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

I shouldn't have let this thread get this far.

Unless there's major progress towards a CBA extension, we can't afford Hasselbeck without decimating our team at numerous other positions, cutting some of the vets we have and replacing them with bums or rookies.

The salary cap situation doesn't practically allow for it.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:34 PM   #59
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I shouldn't have let this thread get this far.

Unless there's major progress towards a CBA extension, we can't afford Hasselbeck without decimating our team at numerous other positions, cutting some of the vets we have and replacing them with bums or rookies.

The salary cap situation doesn't practically allow for it.
Well, and then there's the fact that he's actually the starting quarterback of another team, and has a very large contract with them.

But, on the other hand, it's the offseason...so, you know
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 04:06 PM   #60
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: If the Seahawks released Matt Hasselback should the Skins make a run at signing him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I shouldn't have let this thread get this far.

Unless there's major progress towards a CBA extension, we can't afford Hasselbeck without decimating our team at numerous other positions, cutting some of the vets we have and replacing them with bums or rookies.

The salary cap situation doesn't practically allow for it.
I think the discussion also turned into one about other possible destinations for MH. I know, not relevant for the Redskins, but interesting for football fans in general.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.41350 seconds with 10 queries