So what if Gardner DOES stay?

SKINZ_DOMIN8 · 04-05-2005, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

It is true that Gardner was on a wide open offense. Boy did he have all the opportunity in the world to show himself last year.

You guys make Gardner out to be some horrible player. Yes, he drops balls. He has good speed for a man of his size, and he can make some big plays. He can get YAC, and is better than Moss, Patten, and McCants. If we can trade him, fine. I understand wanting to move on because seeing the spot where he was drafted makes him a bust. However, I bet he'd be at the top of the depth chart. There's a reason he's been a starter for this team for a while.

There looks to be a good chance that we won't get either Edwards or Williams, so that leaves our options at WR in the draft as very slim. Gibbs doesn't seem to like McCants. So we may have to keep Gardner.

Niether Coles NOR Gardner could break a tackle to save their life. At least Coles caught the ball. Gardner couldn't catch a cold. If we keep Gardner it will be the most idiotic move the Redskins have ever made. Cut him outright is what should happen if we don't get any offers for his worthlessness.

SKINZ_DOMIN8 · 04-05-2005, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Skinz - It was reported by the Washington Post that he was doing that. I think Ramsey has potential and played well when given the oppurtunity. I also realize when you take away all of a man's receivers and replace them it takes time for chemistry to form.

Ramsey has a gun, and once his head catches up with his arm - he'll be great. They need to cater the offense to do two things: focus on Portis's strengths (quick cut and go), and Ramsey's strength (less short passes more intermediate to long passes. 7-15 yard completions.

You didn't answer my question. His head will never catch up to his "arm." You really need to start watching the games instead of watching ESPN highlights.

Daseal · 04-05-2005, 12:23 PM

You'd be a great GM, anyone ever tell you that? You're looking like we have the next Jerry Rice to replace him.

Daseal · 04-05-2005, 12:23 PM

Because by watching games I can tell that his head will never catch up with his arm? He's far from a stupid guy, I have a feeling you didn't exactly get into Tulane.

SKINZ_DOMIN8 · 04-05-2005, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Because by watching games I can tell that his head will never catch up with his arm? He's far from a stupid guy, I have a feeling you didn't exactly get into Tulane.

Actually, I went to a real Top 25 academic college.

You Ramsey fanatics will all be proved wrong once again this upcoming season. Too bad it will be another "throw-away" year for the Redskins if he starts the season. We had better find someone that can win games quickly.

SmootSmack · 04-05-2005, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKINZ_DOMIN8

GARDNER IS NOT A #1 RECEIVER!!!!!!!! HE WOULD NOT START ON PENN STATE. WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE SEE THIS???????????

Don't yell

RedskinRat · 04-05-2005, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKINZ_DOMIN8

Actually, I went to a real Top 25 academic college.

Shame you didn't stay past lunch time.

MTK · 04-05-2005, 01:39 PM

Again, the same old argument about Gardner.

Is he horrible, no.

Is he a true #1, a go-to guy? Definitely no.

Is he a good #2? That's debateable.

He's had 4 years to prove himself, he had one good season, and 3 so-so seasons.

Time to move on, end of discussion.

MTK · 04-05-2005, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Shame you didn't stay past lunch time.

ouch!

Redskins_P · 04-05-2005, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Again, the same old argument about Gardner.

Is he horrible, no.

Is he a true #1, a go-to guy? Definitely no.

Is he a good #2? That's debateable.

He's had 4 years to prove himself, he had one good season, and 3 so-so seasons.

Time to move on, end of discussion.

Thank you!

MTK · 04-05-2005, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKINZ_DOMIN8

GARDNER IS NOT A #1 RECEIVER!!!!!!!! HE WOULD NOT START ON PENN STATE. WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE SEE THIS???????????

calm down, zack

Take a breather, have a smoke

TheMalcolmConnection · 04-05-2005, 02:49 PM

Poles.

Red Robert · 04-05-2005, 03:11 PM

Can't we all just get along, let all beat the dead horse some more.

TheMalcolmConnection · 04-05-2005, 03:14 PM

All we're saying is to have a smoke.

BigSKINBauer · 04-05-2005, 03:14 PM

i wouldn't mind i don't like the guy but that is only cause he doesn't seem very loyal. but i wouldn't mind at all and he is one of the better number 2s as long as he doesn't drop the ball. I mean he is the best WR on the market, and if another team was realeasing him some of us would want to pick him up. We got the guy i don't like giving him 2 mil but he could help in some games. patten moss and gardner. seems all good to me, 5 wide, y not! patten moss, gardner, jacobs mcCants. all very capable. BUT IF WE DO KEEP HIM NO PICKING UP ANY WR IN THE DRAFT!!

04-05-2005, 12:23 PM	#48
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? You'd be a great GM, anyone ever tell you that? You're looking like we have the next Jerry Rice to replace him. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

04-05-2005, 12:23 PM	#49
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? Because by watching games I can tell that his head will never catch up with his arm? He's far from a stupid guy, I have a feeling you didn't exactly get into Tulane. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

04-05-2005, 01:39 PM	#53
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,049	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? Again, the same old argument about Gardner. Is he horrible, no. Is he a true #1, a go-to guy? Definitely no. Is he a good #2? That's debateable. He's had 4 years to prove himself, he had one good season, and 3 so-so seasons. Time to move on, end of discussion. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

04-05-2005, 02:49 PM	#57
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? Poles. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

04-05-2005, 03:11 PM	#58
Red Robert Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Charlotte, NC Age: 56 Posts: 306	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? Can't we all just get along, let all beat the dead horse some more.

04-05-2005, 03:14 PM	#59
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? All we're saying is to have a smoke. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

04-05-2005, 03:14 PM	#60
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 38 Posts: 5,688	Re: So what if Gardner DOES stay? i wouldn't mind i don't like the guy but that is only cause he doesn't seem very loyal. but i wouldn't mind at all and he is one of the better number 2s as long as he doesn't drop the ball. I mean he is the best WR on the market, and if another team was realeasing him some of us would want to pick him up. We got the guy i don't like giving him 2 mil but he could help in some games. patten moss and gardner. seems all good to me, 5 wide, y not! patten moss, gardner, jacobs mcCants. all very capable. BUT IF WE DO KEEP HIM NO PICKING UP ANY WR IN THE DRAFT!!

So what if Gardner DOES stay?

Locker Room Main Forum