Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Raiders Skins POST GAME

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2017, 02:57 PM   #61
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Brown was a semi-bust his first four years in the league. A 2012 2nd rounder for Tennessee, they let him walk when his rookie contract was up. He went to Buffalo on a one year deal ($1.25M). So, he was a true free agent and Buffalo had no rights to re-sign unless they tagged him. They were tight under the cap and had lots of folks to replace including their No. 1 CB Stephone Gilmore.

So, we just got lucky. The real question is why he lasted so long in free agency after exploding in the Bills defense last year.

https://www.buffalorumblings.com/buf...ls-free-agency
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-26-2017, 07:50 PM   #62
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain View Post
Some of these stats from the game are dominant.

10 -- tackles for Z Brown
9 - tackles for Spaight
8 - number of different receivers
7 - total number of raiders 1st downs
6 - total number of carries for bitch mode
5 - Vernon Davis was 5-5 on catches/targets
4 - total tackles for Kerrigan, 1 sack 3 TFL
3 - TD passes thrown by Cousins
2 - skins ints
1 - sack allowed by Skins
0 - number of successful 3rd down conversions by the vaunted Raiders offense
Total Domination by the Skins ..... Just Win Baby !
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 10:47 PM   #63
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

So I'm looking back on Perine's game like I did with Kelley week 1, and he definitely missed some opportunities, but there were some head scratchers in the blocking. Here's a blown play by Brandon Scherff:

Scherff pulls.


He has two Defensive players that he could target to help create what looks like it could've been a nice running lane for Perine.


But instead . . .


He knocks Lauvao off his block, freeing a defender.


Who makes the play for a short gain.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 11:44 PM   #64
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Raiders Skins POST GAME

So here is the one where Perine left some yards on the field. Listening to Cooley and Riggins this AM, they were saying that he wasn't patient with his runs. I didn't see many instances where he was missing big holes, but I did see what they were talking about with plunging forward without letting his blocks develop / helping to setup his blocks. Here's an example:



After the handoff he begins pressing straight forward too quickly. If he were to hesitate here he can get the LBs to commit one way or another and see where his line opens a lane.


A nice lane opens to the left, but Perine has already pressed right up his lineman's ass and limited his options.


So he plunges forward and is stuffed.



I have a feeling that this is common for young RBs and coachable, as opposed to poor field vision which is not. I'm hoping it's the former rather than the latter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 12:42 AM   #65
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

that was one hell of a beat down. if we play every game like that, we don't lose.

extremely impressive and exciting.
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 10:46 AM   #66
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,612
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quarterback Kirk Cousins was named NFC Offensive Player of the Week after completing 25-of-30 passes for 365 yards and three touchdowns vs. the Raiders. It's the fourth time he's received the honor.

Cousins named NFC Offensive Player of the Week.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 04:40 PM   #67
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,728
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
Nothing more enjoyable in football, than watching your team punch people in the mouth on defense. That was utter domination. Minus the fumbles, could have been a shut out.


Should have been 30-0. But im fine with the results. In close games we have to protect the ball better down there for sure!
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 06:03 PM   #68
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Will H -- good stuff man. Im not sure we can put it on Perine for the 2nd post breakdown. If the play is a designed run right without him looking to cut back or him having the option to cut back, I cant blame him for running the play how it is supposed to be run.

If its a zone run type play were perine should be looking to cut back, then that is a horse of a different color.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 02:26 PM   #69
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain View Post
Will H -- good stuff man. Im not sure we can put it on Perine for the 2nd post breakdown. If the play is a designed run right without him looking to cut back or him having the option to cut back, I cant blame him for running the play how it is supposed to be run.



If its a zone run type play were perine should be looking to cut back, then that is a horse of a different color.


Definitely agree, I have no knowledge of what plays were called and who's responsible to do what. I was basing it off of what Cooley and Riggo were saying, but that may not have been one of the plays they were talking about, but it did look like it.

Having scrutinized all the run plays, Davis was the worst culprit in missing / letting blocks go too quickly. I counted 5 runs in which the defender he was "blocking" was in on the tackle. I think this was the primary reason for the low yards/carry for Perine, but he also didn't break tackles or make people miss. I'm not ready to write him off, but it wasn't a great first start.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 02:40 PM   #70
insane4theskinsi
Special Teams
 
insane4theskinsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 145
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

i hope rob and marvin plat.
insane4theskinsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 02:44 PM   #71
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,612
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by WillH View Post
Definitely agree, I have no knowledge of what plays were called and who's responsible to do what. I was basing it off of what Cooley and Riggo were saying, but that may not have been one of the plays they were talking about, but it did look like it.

Having scrutinized all the run plays, Davis was the worst culprit in missing / letting blocks go too quickly. I counted 5 runs in which the defender he was "blocking" was in on the tackle. I think this was the primary reason for the low yards/carry for Perine, but he also didn't break tackles or make people miss. I'm not ready to write him off, but it wasn't a great first start.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
what did you see from Mack Brown?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 02:52 PM   #72
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
what did you see from Mack Brown?


Off the top of my head, on his longest run he had a hole you could drive two trucks through side by side. I'll post something later.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 03:10 PM   #73
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,875
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by WillH View Post
Off the top of my head, on his longest run he had a hole you could drive two trucks through side by side. I'll post something later.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would you say a Mack truck?
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 03:30 PM   #74
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,612
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Would you say a Mack truck?
this is great
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 08:32 PM   #75
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Raiders Skins POST GAME

Alright so here's the play I was talking about. I'm not sure if this was a designed play or a great decision by Mack.

After the handoff he's approaching the line, but there's nothing there.


So he bounces it to the outside, so was it the play call or a good cut? I honestly think it was designed based on the way Davis is blocking on the edge, but regardless, he sells the inside run well and bounces out to open field.



And just look at all that room, it looks like this could be a break away play, but which way to go? From this angle it looks like he has a defender in the middle and if he follows his block maybe he can get by him to the outside. But look at the other angle


Looks like a beautiful lane to the inside, but . . .


Instead he kind of awkwardly hides behind his blocker until he is surrounded. While I appreciate him trying to follow his blocks, he needs to set his cut off of the block and try to break this open.

That said, watching the play in motion, I don't know that either choice would have been the better one. If he cut inside he'd still have to break a tackle or some ankles, and maybe he can't .

Overall he actually had some good looking plays, they didn't gain as much, but he made some nice cuts. More to come ...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.45828 seconds with 10 queries