2009 Free Agents

CRedskinsRule · 03-10-2009, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Orlando Pace was just released.

ProFootballTalk.com - RAMS RELEASE PACE

What about a stop-gap solution with Pace and using our 13th overall on DE or LB?

Hey SmootSmacks magic 8 ball works

http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-l...tml#post532907

Ruhskins · 03-10-2009, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

He apparently played most of last year but was out 2006 and 2007 season due to injury.

He's on his last pair of legs but may be serviceable if we are looking at defense with the 13th overall.

I'd still rather have a youth movement on the OL but if there is a stellar defensive player on the board I wouldn't want to be precluded from picking him.

Thanks for the info, I wasn't sure when was it that he was injured. Getting someone like Pace right now would be a question of $$ and interest. I don't think someone like him should be paid that much (I mean the Rams tried to trade him unsuccessfully). And whether he'd be willing to come here, I'm not sure if they would start him right away or make him compete with JJ and Heyer. According to JLC, VC is looking for a starting tackle though, and I think Pace would be one.

skinsfan_nn · 03-10-2009, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Orlando Pace was just released.

ProFootballTalk.com - RAMS RELEASE PACE

What about a stop-gap solution with Pace and using our 13th overall on DE or LB?

NO THANKS! Hes old and has to many injuries. He "might" be able to play a year or two else where. Not in DC!

Not to mention hes a LT which we don't need.

GMScud · 03-10-2009, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

NO THANKS! Hes old and has to many injuries. He "might" be able to play a year or two else where. Not in DC!

Not to mention hes a LT which we don't need.

He could extend his longevity at the tackle position if he slides over to RT, but I want a young solution at tackle, not another old stop-gap.

Ruhskins · 03-10-2009, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

NO THANKS! Hes old and has to many injuries. He "might" be able to play a year or two else where. Not in DC!

Not to mention hes a LT which we don't need.

I think the whole purpose would be for him to be a stop-gap and allowed the team to use the #13 on a defensive player (i.e. LB). While no one wants our line to get older, we definitely can't just sign a FA b/c they are young.

skinsfan_nn · 03-10-2009, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I think the whole purpose would be for him to be a stop-gap and allowed the team to use the #13 on a defensive player (i.e. LB). While no one wants our line to get older, we definitely can't just sign a FA b/c they are young.

Well you certainly don't want to sign an old vet. That has injury problems like most of the current O-line what sense does that make?

Then try to play him out of position. Hes a LT! Makes even less sense.

If you want a RT to replace OR challenge JJ. Get a FA, RT in here.

SFREDSKIN · 03-10-2009, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Bodden is a steal for the Pats, but what else is new. We probably didn't have the cap space to throw at a non issue like that, honestly (it's less that we don't have enough, but that we don't have means to create any more should we run out), but I'm guessing his contract is not quite what Hall's looks like.

We could have had him for $750,000, dumb not to sign him. We could have cut Thrash or Yodder.

BigHairedAristocrat · 03-10-2009, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I think the whole purpose would be for him to be a stop-gap and allowed the team to use the #13 on a defensive player (i.e. LB). While no one wants our line to get older, we definitely can't just sign a FA b/c they are young.

Exactly. I couldnt have said it better myself. Signing Pace would be a brilliant move. Between Samuels and Pace, i'd probably move Samuels to RT and keep Pace at LT. Next year we could draft a T with our 1st round pick and groom him behind Samuels and Pace.

This year, we could sit at 13 and take Maualuga if he's still there or trade down in the first (if we find a partner) and pick up a 2nd round pick. In the latter scenario, id draft LB and DE with my first two picks and use the third rounder on a project lineman.

GMScud · 03-10-2009, 06:54 PM

Oh boy. Here comes the Orlando Pace thread....

GTripp0012 · 03-10-2009, 07:01 PM

Pace is better than nothing. But, that's about it. He's probably a better one year option at RT than Jansen, but we can rely on him for about three weeks before we can expect him to be injured.

He'd be a good fit as our second string LT. But if we try to play him at RT, we'd likely just lose him for the year.

SmootSmack · 03-10-2009, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Oh boy. Here comes the Orlando Pace thread....

Been waiting for this moment

http://www.thewarpath.net/532907-post100.html

That Guy · 03-10-2009, 07:34 PM

it depends on the cost. pace would be a good one year option, but with his history, i wouldn't guarantee him much money... that way he can be cut when he gets hurt and whatever he didn't earn can go somewhere else...

WaldSkins · 03-10-2009, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Been waiting for this moment

http://www.thewarpath.net/532907-post100.html

I do remember saying no to him then

89moss89 · 03-10-2009, 07:50 PM

What about Marvel Smith from the Steelers. I know that he was hurt last year but I heard him on Sirius NFL radio a couple of weeks ago and he said that he was 100%. He started out as a RT when he first was drafted by the Steelers and moved to LT a few years ago. I haven't heard much about him during the free agency period but he was a solid player when healthy.

SmootSmack · 03-10-2009, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 89moss89

What about Marvel Smith from the Steelers. I know that he was hurt last year but I heard him on Sirius NFL radio a couple of weeks ago and he said that he was 100%. He started out as a RT when he first was drafted by the Steelers and moved to LT a few years ago. I haven't heard much about him during the free agency period but he was a solid player when healthy.

I'm pretty sure he's going back to Pittsburgh

View Poll Results: The ONE (1, El Unico) Free Agent You Want
Albert Haynesworth	71	45.81%
Chris Canty	10	6.45%
Christian Shephard	3	1.94%
DeAngelo Hall	26	16.77%
Derrick Dockery	22	14.19%
Jason Brown	6	3.87%
Some Other Dude	17	10.97%
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll

03-10-2009, 06:54 PM	#864
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 12,626	Re: 2009 Free Agents Oh boy. Here comes the Orlando Pace thread.... __________________ Tardy

03-10-2009, 07:01 PM	#865
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 36 Posts: 15,994	Re: 2009 Free Agents Pace is better than nothing. But, that's about it. He's probably a better one year option at RT than Jansen, but we can rely on him for about three weeks before we can expect him to be injured. He'd be a good fit as our second string LT. But if we try to play him at RT, we'd likely just lose him for the year. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

03-10-2009, 07:34 PM	#867
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: 2009 Free Agents it depends on the cost. pace would be a good one year option, but with his history, i wouldn't guarantee him much money... that way he can be cut when he gets hurt and whatever he didn't earn can go somewhere else...

03-10-2009, 07:50 PM	#869
89moss89 Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: PENNSYLVANIA Age: 56 Posts: 29	Re: 2009 Free Agents What about Marvel Smith from the Steelers. I know that he was hurt last year but I heard him on Sirius NFL radio a couple of weeks ago and he said that he was 100%. He started out as a RT when he first was drafted by the Steelers and moved to LT a few years ago. I haven't heard much about him during the free agency period but he was a solid player when healthy.

2009 Free Agents

Locker Room Main Forum