Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Nope...disagree. We have a medicore QB playing for us now and we're 3-6. Don't even give the defense a free pass to suck this year.

He isn't mediocre. He is the worst starting QB in the NFL.

Andrew Walter is 10 times better than him.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

If I had to choose I guess I'm in the #2 category.

A few weeks ago I was probably #3.

#1 is just ridiculous and anyone that considers themselves to be a #1 has no clue and is beyond repair as a Redskins fan.

What is rediculous about #1? I didn't see anything in there that was rediculous.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 11-13-2006, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I agree with you. The problem is that the majority of people don't want to know about big picture. They don't want to think that Rivers sat for two years, or Romo for three. All that matters is the here and now.

I agree with Gibbs' decision to start Brunell in the Eagles game and I think Campbell will benefit from sitting on the sidelines, but I would not agree with a decision to start Brunell next week. The only reason to continue to start Brunell and not get Campbell experience is to hold out hope that we can make the playoffs. I do not think that we have any chance of making the playoffs, I cannot see a 7-0 run, and so I think Campbell should be given the nod.

We'd probably win more games with Brunell than Campbell this season, but I'd prefer to give Campbell experience. To me, starting Brunell just brings us a lower draft pick next year and gives Campbell less experience. So, I think that Campbell should start, but I am not thinking about the here and now. I am focused solely on the future.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 11-13-2006, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

He isn't mediocre. He is the worst starting QB in the NFL.

Andrew Walter is 10 times better than him.

I think that's a bit of an overstatement and I want Brunell benched.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

I agree with Gibbs' decision to start Brunell in the Eagles game and I think Campbell will benefit from sitting on the sidelines, but I would not agree with a decision to start Brunell next week. The only reason to continue to start Brunell and not get Campbell experience is to hold out hope that we can make the playoffs. I do not think that we have any chance of making the playoffs, I cannot see a 7-0 run, and so I think Campbell should be given the nod.

We'd probably win more games with Brunell than Campbell this season, but I'd prefer to give Campbell experience. To me, starting Brunell just brings us a lower draft pick next year and gives Campbell less experience. So, I think that Campbell should start, but I am not thinking about the here and now. I am focused solely on the future.

If Gibbs starts Brunell next week, he believes that this team can run the table. If that is true, he needs to leave on the same bus as the bum that has been shoved down our throat the last 3 years.

I am more worried about the regression of Sean Taylor. He looked terrible yesterday. Sean needs to start studying film because there was no excuse for the bite on Stallworth.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

I think that's a bit of an overstatement and I want Brunell benched.

OK. Walter is 2 or 3 times better. I did notice that you don't have a candidate who is worse.

There are teams with 2 or 3 QB's on their roster better than him.

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

What is rediculous about #1? I didn't see anything in there that was rediculous.

Nothing ridiculous? What isn't ridiculous about #1?

Let me go point by point so you can understand.

Quote:

1. Mark Brunell is washed up and is the reason we are 3 - 6. For many of these folks, it's become personal. Their hatred of Brunell is so strong that is is bleeding on to Gibbs. If Mark Brunell led us to 7 straight wins and a Super Bowl victory, they would still find things to complain about. I suspect that some of them were almost pleased when Bunell threw the pick today. A further subset of this group believes that there is something untoward about the fact that Gibbs and Brunell are both Christians. Another subset consists of the "Fedayeen Ramsey". They were horrified that Ramsey was benched during last year's Chicago game and have never recovered.

Point #1: Brunell is not the only reason we are 3-6. Does a 30th ranked D ring a bell at all? Injuries? There are many factors that play into the fact we are 3-6. It's not all on one guy. If you really do think that I'm sorry but you are just an ignorant fool.

Point #2: If by the grace of God we somehow managed to run the table and win the Super Bowl and you STILL complained, I'm sorry but that's just beyond ridiculous and you have let your personal feelings taint your fandom beyond repair.

Point #3: This whole thing about Gibbs and Brunell being linked by religion is assanine. Ramsey is also a Christian and that certainly didn't help him any. And what's more disturbing is this strange fascination that some people have with Ramsey. A guy that mind you is riding the bench in NY right now and let's face it, with Pennington playing well and a promising young rookie there with him he stands little chance of ever being the starting QB there. I guess the Jets are also just missing the boat on this next Joe Montana.

illdefined · 11-13-2006, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I know some people are going to FREAK if Campbell doesn't start next week, but in the big picture how much playing time he gets this year is not going to make or break his development. Yes he does need some playing time and we do need to get a snapshot of him to see what we have to build on for next year, but at the same time Gibbs clearly has a long term plan for Campbell that isn't totally dependent on how much he plays this year.

ok, and whats the benefit of letting Brunell start next week? whats the plan there, to run the table?

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Nothing ridiculous? What isn't ridiculous about #1?

Let me go point by point so you can understand.

Point #1: Brunell is not the only reason we are 3-6. Does a 30th ranked D ring a bell at all? Injuries? There are many factors that play into the fact we are 3-6. It's not all on one guy. If you really do think that I'm sorry but you are just an ignorant fool.

Point #2: If by the grace of God we somehow managed to run the table and win the Super Bowl and you STILL complained, I'm sorry but that's just beyond ridiculous and you have let your personal feelings taint your fandom beyond repair.

Point #3: This whole thing about Gibbs and Brunell being linked by religion is assanine. Ramsey is also a Christian and that certainly didn't help him any. And what's more disturbing is this strange fascination that some people have with Ramsey. A guy that mind you is riding the bench in NY right now and let's face it, with Pennington playing well and a promising young rookie there with him he stands little chance of ever being the starting QB there. I guess the Jets are also just missing the boat on this next Joe Montana.

LOL. I am an ignorant fool. Keep defending the worst starting QB in the league Matty. You are a joke.

So I can understand? HA HA HA

You have defended him all year. Look in the mirror pal.

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illdefined

ok, and whats the benefit of letting Brunell start next week? whats the plan there, to run the table?

The message is the team is going to fight through until the season is officially out of reach.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

The message is the team is going to fight through until the season is officially out of reach.

That makes a lot of sense. We moved up to draft a kid in the first round but we need to show that we are going to fight by keeping the washed up injured bum in.

Do I need to break this down so you can understand?

LOL

illdefined · 11-13-2006, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

The message is the team is going to fight through until the season is officially out of reach.

the message to who? certainly not the fans, and i personally think the team is thinking the same thing as the fans....help, throw us a lifesaver.

Dogtag · 11-13-2006, 11:39 AM

I was not able to see last Sunday's game; however, I am moving from #3 towards #2. I think JC is still a project. But since every game has to be a Redskin victory or the fans call for wholesale changes in personnel (change a player and the victory will happen philosophy ... a variation of the instant gratification syndrome), put JC into the lineup. I don't think it will matter if JC is under center for this season. If JC plays and does not win the rest of the games then at least we can justify getting rid of all our QBs in the offseason because they did not win in 2006.

Is this really where we are going??

SmootSmack · 11-13-2006, 11:40 AM

The worst starting QB in the league? To use a Grim21 favorite "Smarten up"

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

LOL. I am an ignorant fool. Keep defending the worst starting QB in the league Matty. You are a joke.

Dude, I'm not defending him, please show me where I am.

I said I fall in the #2 category, which if you read it carefully says I am in favor of making the switch.

If you don't see anything ridiculous in #1 I'm sorry but you are indeed an ignorant fool. #1 is totally irrational.

11-13-2006, 11:39 AM	#88
Dogtag Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Dumfries, VA Age: 71 Posts: 241	Re: Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test I was not able to see last Sunday's game; however, I am moving from #3 towards #2. I think JC is still a project. But since every game has to be a Redskin victory or the fans call for wholesale changes in personnel (change a player and the victory will happen philosophy ... a variation of the instant gratification syndrome), put JC into the lineup. I don't think it will matter if JC is under center for this season. If JC plays and does not win the rest of the games then at least we can justify getting rid of all our QBs in the offseason because they did not win in 2006. Is this really where we are going??

11-13-2006, 11:40 AM	#89
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test The worst starting QB in the league? To use a Grim21 favorite "Smarten up" __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test

Locker Room Main Forum