![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 46
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I’m actually anxious to hear more players opinions on the tempo of practice, it sounds pretty rough out there. I hope that it does not have a negative effect on team morale, especially if there are more injuries early in camp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 42
Posts: 965
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I like this deal a lot. Its gonna be weird seeing another Taylor and it not being #21.
__________________
Same freakout different year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Daniels' injury could be a blessing in disguise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Blessing in disguise? How? The guy has been dancing all off season. Plus he wants to only play one more year. This is why you have draft picks waiting in the wings when your 50 year old DE does down. And don't give me any Buzbee talk cause he didn't even see the field last year. He was a practice squad player. I'm talking about a draft pick that can step right in. What about Evans?? You don't see the NYG trading for anyone once Strahan stepped down. That's cause they prepared for his retirement. I think depending on Daniels to make it through another year was a mistake and this trade was a knee jerk reaction. Awful trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Simple, Jason Taylor is a Pro Bowl caliber player. Phillip Daniels while a solid player was nothing special. We needed this upgrade even before Daniels went down. Now we have two ends who can both get around the corner. I don't see how you can not like this deal considering the circumstances. And there's already been indications that he will play out his 2 years at the least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
1. Agree that losing Daniels is not a blessing in disguise 2. So he danced, so what? It's not like he got out of shape or has ever come to a season unprepared 3. How do you know a draft pick would be any more prepared to come in than a player who actually has a year of NFL experience, albeit limited, under his belt? 4. How exactly did the Giants prepare for Strahan's retirement? 5. I think labeling this trade awful is...a knee jerk reaction
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
2. It just seems selfish to go on TV and prance around when your team went 1-15 and you're suppose to be one of the leaders. Do that shit you retire. I don't blame Parcells one damn bit. I'm sure he wasn't busting his ass staying in shape like his teammates were. He seems more worried about his Hollywood career at this point of his life than his football career. 3. I'm saying a guy that has been on the bench for a few years. Not someone right out of the draft. Like D. Evans. Why not plug him in and give the guy a chance? How many years has he been here????? It's time for him to become a full time player!! I just think that constantly chasing old guys cause we don't a plan is not the way to do things. This is the 2nd year in a row where we had to give up draft picks and bring in an old guy cause there was no one of any quality waiting behind the current starter. No plan last year when Dock left. Oh yeah... we tried that Todd Wade experiment. That didn't go over so well. The reason I'm not happy about his trade is we've already tried this way for several years and it hasn't wokred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
2. It's the offseason. He's entitled, especially considering what he's proven for over a decade, to do what he wants. He'll probably have more sacks alone than all of the Dolphins DEs 3. I'm sure Evans will get playing time, regardless.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
I also think it's very important to point out (while knocking on wood) that Jason Taylor hasn't missed a game since 1999 (he missed 1 that year), and has only missed 4 his entire career. Not to mention he said Dancing With Stars has his flexibility better than it's ever been. Some nice positives there.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
I don't think he'll be a top 5 either but not because of age. Last year, at age 33) he had 11 sacks, 1 INT and a TD. Not too shabby for a decrepit old geezer.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I'm still not a fan of this deal, but I spin it this way: at least we didn't give up a mid round pick to go after a guy who really wouldn't help us in the short term and has no development potential.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|