Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

The worst starting QB in the league? To use a Grim21 favorite "Smarten up"

Who is worse? Smarten' up.

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illdefined

the message to who? certainly not the fans, and i personally think the team is thinking the same thing as the fans....help, throw us a lifesaver.

LOL I'm sure you don't think that Campbell is a lifesaver.

The message to the team is to fight to the bitter end. The coaches will learn alot about these guys over the next few weeks and will probably go a long way in shaping the team next year.

SmootSmack · 11-13-2006, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

Who is worse? Smarten' up.

You're the one who came out with the blanket statement. Prove that he is the worst.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

LOL I'm sure you don't think that Campbell is a lifesaver.

The message to the team is to fight to the bitter end. The coaches will learn alot about these guys over the next few weeks and will probably go a long way in shaping the team next year.

Well we don't know do we? Why not? Because they keep suiting up the guy who has proven that he cannot get it done.

We know that Brunell cannot get the job done. Anyone who argues that he can needs to be in a padded cell.

So let's see if one of the other two can win before we ruin the 2007 season.

TheMalcolmConnection · 11-13-2006, 11:48 AM

Let me put it this way. Brunell can (even though I prefer Campbell) get it done WITH a defense like we had in 2004 or 2005. With THIS YEAR, we have to have an offense capable of FAR outscoring the other team since our defense can't stop anyone right now.

With THIS team, Brunell is not capable of getting it done.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

You're the one who came out with the blanket statement. Prove that he is the worst.

Did you see the game yesterday? What else do you need?

Name a QB, I will prove how they are better than Brunell right now.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Let me put it this way. Brunell can (even though I prefer Campbell) get it done WITH a defense like we had in 2004 or 2005. With THIS YEAR, we have to have an offense capable of FAR outscoring the other team since our defense can't stop anyone right now.

With THIS team, Brunell is not capable of getting it done.

We scored 3 points yesterday. Our offense has scored 3 points in every division road game this year.

The 85 bears combined with the 2001 Ravens wouldn't be able to win under those circumstances.

70chip13083 · 11-13-2006, 11:51 AM

I'm definately a #2. Any chance for a playoff birth is basically over. If we consider Campbell the future of the team, isn't it time we see what he can do? Isn't this the ONLY reasonable thing to do at this point? I think any other decision is ridiculous. However, I was listening to triple x radio this morning. Apparently the prevailing thought is that if a switch takes place, it will be Collins and not Campbell. What a nightmare.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70chip13083

I'm definately a #2. Any chance for a playoff birth is basically over. If we consider Campbell the future of the team, isn't it time we see what he can do? Isn't this the ONLY reasonable thing to do at this point? I think any other decision is ridiculous. However, I was listening to triple x radio this morning. Apparently the prevailing thought is that if a switch takes place, it will be Collins and not Campbell. What a nightmare.

That gives Saunders a chance to save face.

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

Did you see the game yesterday? What else do you need?

Name a QB, I will prove how they are better than Brunell right now.

How are you going to prove it? By saying someone is 10 times better?

Brilliant.

Nothing ridiculous there.

freddyg12 · 11-13-2006, 11:53 AM

I'm in the #2 camp. It's time for a change, for all the reasons that everyone else has already given.

illdefined · 11-13-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

LOL I'm sure you don't think that Campbell is a lifesaver.

The message to the team is to fight to the bitter end. The coaches will learn alot about these guys over the next few weeks and will probably go a long way in shaping the team next year.

oh i know he isn't a lifesaver, he won't fix the defense. he may be able to score some more or keep them off the field a bit more, but he won't fix it.

JC still represents hope though, something the fans and the team have simply lost to this point. Everything JC would do, would be a step for the future. Brunell inspires nothing but frustration to everybody, and i don't know why the team would want to fight and risk injury on a lame duck quarterback who's helped put them in this position.

i noticed you only agreed to one of Tripp's paragraphs, what did you think about the rest? do you think we OWE Brunell a better departure than that?

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

How are you going to prove it? By saying someone is 10 times better?

Brilliant.

Nothing ridiculous there.

No one ever exaggerates on the site do they Matty?

Hey, at least I will show that I will fight!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

No one ever exaggerates on the site do they Matty?

Hey, at least I will show that I will fight!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

well at least you are consistent, all of your posts are exaggerations (of reality)

MTK · 11-13-2006, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by illdefined

i noticed you only agreed to one of Tripp's paragraphs, what did you think about the rest? do you think we OWE Brunell a better departure than that?

what do you mean?

11-13-2006, 11:48 AM	#95
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test Let me put it this way. Brunell can (even though I prefer Campbell) get it done WITH a defense like we had in 2004 or 2005. With THIS YEAR, we have to have an offense capable of FAR outscoring the other team since our defense can't stop anyone right now. With THIS team, Brunell is not capable of getting it done. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

11-13-2006, 11:51 AM	#98
70chip13083 Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Lexington KY Posts: 27	Re: Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test I'm definately a #2. Any chance for a playoff birth is basically over. If we consider Campbell the future of the team, isn't it time we see what he can do? Isn't this the ONLY reasonable thing to do at this point? I think any other decision is ridiculous. However, I was listening to triple x radio this morning. Apparently the prevailing thought is that if a switch takes place, it will be Collins and not Campbell. What a nightmare. __________________ "Football is, after all, a wonderful way to get rid of your aggressions without going to jail for it"-Heywood Hale Brown

11-13-2006, 11:53 AM	#101
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test I'm in the #2 camp. It's time for a change, for all the reasons that everyone else has already given.

Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock Test

Locker Room Main Forum