Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2009, 01:11 PM   #1
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I'm glad to see Vinny being careful with these negotiations. The Redskins have had many cap issues over the past years and have had a history of overpaying players and getting into huge contracts that financially cripple the team. I'm sure the Vinny haters are going to pounce if we do not get Hall (even though they are probably the same ones that complain about the huge signings and free agent spending). I do hope and I think we're going to get Hall signed.

I think if Hall takes a hometown discount, it would show that his attitude has changed. I mean Sean Taylor was not a model citizen, but he changed his ways. Let's hope the same thing is happening to Hall. Also, re-signing him to a reasonable price would help us in acquiring other players that are needed to fill the needs that the team has.
I think this is a realistic point of view Ruhskins. I don't think he needs to sign for a discount. I just think there needs to be a well balanced agreement. One that doesn't insult Hall and at the same time keep our $ in order. Dont fool yourself. I garantee other teams would take him quick. And next season we can be talking about why did VC let him go.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 12:36 PM   #2
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 47
Posts: 5,829
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

My opinion (not that anybody cares) is that we obviouslly need to keep the guy. I do not know about that "at any cost" thing, but we almost cannot afford to lose him without picking up another CB else where.

Shawn Springs (as many have already pointed out) is past his prime and often injured. Many believe that he is the best corner on our team. Based on what exactly? Oh, congrats he locked down T.O. until he had to leave the game with an injury. Then Carlos picked up his slack. He is not worth his paycheck.

Carlos Rogers is (IMO) the best corner on the squad. He is even keel. He will defense any teams best reciever week in and week out. He will not get the intercecptios, but he rarely allows the big play either. The FO and others on this site should be ashamed for considering letting him go for draft picks. In reality you would not get more than 2 picks for the guy, and you would have to use one of them to attempt to replace him. It's not worth it.

Fred Smoot...I have a soft spot for Smoot, I really do. The reality is however that he is not the CB he used to be. The only reason that he should stay is because of depth and experience. I would hate to think what would happen if there wasn't a Fred Smoot to play in front of a Justin Tryon. Smoot may give up some plays at times but he unlike Springs can actually take the field most of the time. He can also be valuable to the team in terms of helping the younger guys out. He doesn't fly off to Texas in the middle of the week.

Justin Tryon...do not get me started. He has alot to learn and his youth alone gives him another shot at the squad in the offseason.

So as you can see if we do not keep Hall we are going to be in a world of hurt at the CB position. Especially if we trade Rogers. Everybody saw what our defense was like in the 4th quarter this past season...giving up big plays and not getting off of the field. We already have a suspect D line. If we compound that with a weaker secondary, then our defense will really be frustrating to watch when the game is on the line.

Last edited by KLHJ2; 01-27-2009 at 09:12 PM.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 10:24 PM   #3
gaudiomatt
Camp Scrub
 
gaudiomatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry View Post
My opinion (not that anybody cares) is that we obviouslly need to keep the guy. I do not know about that "at any cost" thing, but we almost cannot afford to lose him without picking up another CB else where.

Shawn Springs (as many have already pointed out) is past his prime and often injured. Many believe that he is the best corner on our team. Based on what exactly? Oh, congrats he locked down T.O. until he had to leave the game with an injury. Then Carlos picked up his slack. He is not worth his paycheck.

Carlos Rogers is (IMO) the best corner on the squad. He is even keel. He will defense any teams best reciever week in and week out. He will not get the intercecptios, but he rarely allows the big play either. The FO and others on this site should be ashamed for considering letting him go for draft picks. In reality you would not get more than 2 picks for the guy, and you would have to use one of them to attempt to replace him. It's not worth it.

Fred Smoot...I have a soft spot for Smoot, I really do. The reality is however that he is not the CB he used to be. The only reason that he should stay is because of depth and experience. I would hate to think what would happen if there wasn't a Fred Smoot to play in front of a Justin Tryon. Smoot may give up some plays at times but he unlike Springs can actually take the field most of the time. He can also be valuable to the team in terms of helping the younger guys out. He doesn't fly off to Texas in the middle of the week.

Justin Tryon...do not get me started. He has alot to learn and his youth alone gives him another shot at the squad in the offseason.

So as you can see if we do not keep Hall we are going to be in a world of hurt at the CB position. Especially if we trade Rogers. Everybody saw what our defense was like in the 4th quarter this past season...giving up big plays and not getting off of the field. We already have a suspect D line. If we compound that with a weaker secondary, then our defense will really be frustrating to watch when the game is on the line.
Agree with the whole thing. Haha just supporting someone not supporting ignorance. A lot of people say they hate Cerratto and then support decisions that only Vinny Cerratto would continue to make at this point. Thats the problem with him, he's like a fan running a team, he just wants big names and doesn't know how to build. but reallly good post.
gaudiomatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 12:38 PM   #4
mehtadman87
Camp Scrub
 
mehtadman87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

i think we should low ball him, we need to start making smart contract deals, give him less guarnateed and more incentives. give him a $2 mil bonus for not getting burned like he always does. That would be money well spent. We all know danny got money but to give out high guarenteed contract to a dude who is known to slack is just stupid
mehtadman87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 07:07 PM   #5
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mehtadman87 View Post
i think we should low ball him, we need to start making smart contract deals, give him less guarnateed and more incentives. give him a $2 mil bonus for not getting burned like he always does. That would be money well spent. We all know danny got money but to give out high guarenteed contract to a dude who is known to slack is just stupid
where do you get this stuff about slacking. Have you acually followed his carrier? The guy is a great talent and will only get better. Stop believing the rumors. He's for real.

Funny how we wish we had this guy or that guy but when we get a chance at something good we won't see it. This guy goes somewhere else we will regret it.

Last edited by 44ever; 01-28-2009 at 08:44 AM.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 12:41 PM   #6
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

I think the redskins and hall can meet halfway if both are really seriously interested in having hall being a redskin and if these really are the proposed numbers - I say somewhere around $14m.

Hall is a very good cover corner with underrated skills; he's not a shutdown corner, but who is nowadays? Plus he provides some threat to opposing qbs in his ability to snatch interceptions and return skills. That's something that the redskins lack in the secondary.
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 12:51 PM   #7
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

I suppose the problem isn't that he's got a poor work ethic, because he's clearly getting better with experience, but that he's just lacking a few skills that all elite corners have: route recognition, the ability to close on a dime, and stuff like that. He's certainly a good player, Oakland days aside, but he's also a known quantity at this point, and he's not known as a special, elite player.

I won't use the word average around him, because he does do some skills exceptionally well. But he also has glaring weaknesses that we can't ignore since NFL QBs don't.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:24 PM   #8
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I suppose the problem isn't that he's got a poor work ethic, because he's clearly getting better with experience, but that he's just lacking a few skills that all elite corners have: route recognition, the ability to close on a dime, and stuff like that. He's certainly a good player, Oakland days aside, but he's also a known quantity at this point, and he's not known as a special, elite player.

I won't use the word average around him, because he does do some skills exceptionally well. But he also has glaring weaknesses that we can't ignore since NFL QBs don't.
Hall has all the athletic ability. Of the couple things you mention; he can close on a dime & has tremendous speed. The first is spot on IMO; "route recognition." That typically comes from study, knowing tendencies of teams & wr's. Hall ain't into that. It was the same way when he was in college. I remember a friend of mine calling him underated after we left a VT game in which he got burnt. Word from insiders was that he was a problem for coaches & players. He was widely regarded as one of the reasons the 03 Hokies went from top 5 to losing a bowl to Cal & giving up 52 points, just because of the divisiness he created on the team. Seems those ways came w/him to the nfl. Has he learned? I don't know, if he gets paid he'll likely continue his ways & play undisciplined at a position that requires great discipline.

He was a top 10 draft pick due to his athletic ability & potential, not his actual performance. He could be a true shut down cb, but that would require some work in practice, which he's never believed he needs.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:03 PM   #9
Son Of Man
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

With Shawn "Sprain" (who needs to be traded or released), Smoot (who is a real redskin but aging), Carlos Rogers (who pretty much got benched in the second half of the season), and JT Tryon (no comment necessary) as the CB's on our roster. Signing Hall would be a prudent decision. However, all business deals start with a low offer then a gradual increase to a final number which offers one party a fair payscale and the other a vaule for price paid. I believe they'll get the deal done.
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:14 PM   #10
A10sROCK
Impact Rookie
 
A10sROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Hall will be signed and will probably be the biggest Redskin signing this off-season. Those that say he should be signed "at any price" ignore the economics of the cap and the NFL. This team is way too heavy with old, expensive vets to keep ignoring the fact that they tend ot overpay for players.

We need Hall and and will resign him. However the team must also make decisions on several defensive players who simply cost too much: Jason Taylor, Shawn Springs and cornelius Griffin.

People on these boards always want to keep the veterans that they know - but eventually these guys cost too much for their production.
A10sROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:35 PM   #11
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

I wish people would stop taking pft.com rumors are truth.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:38 PM   #12
A10sROCK
Impact Rookie
 
A10sROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
I wish people would stop taking pft.com rumors are truth.
Lawyers, coaches and players use this venue to argue their cause or issue. Truth is relative, as any story gets printed.

Personally, I see Hall being hired as both sides want it and his value is whatever someone will pay for him.

Ppl here are complaining about X dollars for Hall when we are paying Springs about a $1 mill a game, or about $2 mill for each Jason Taylor sack. Both of those guys had less games last season together than Hall played.
A10sROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 01:47 PM   #13
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

There is no doubting Hall's talent. I think there is a reason why teams stopped targeting Hall late in the season, and in my opinion Hall is worth every cent of 16 million (or whatever amount Synder gives him). I'm with Ruhskins on how Hall is portrayed by some of you guystalk about his "bad character". GIVE IT A REST He had a coach who quit in the middle of the seson and yapped on ESPN. WHO Gives A F... I mean we had ST (allegedly) pulling guns on people nice guy but he was somewhat shady. BUT he matured and changed and so will Hall.

Point is I expect for him to Re-sign and have a pro bowl year

Last edited by vallin21; 01-27-2009 at 02:07 PM.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 02:02 PM   #14
PWNED
The Starter
 
PWNED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 34
Posts: 1,160
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.
PWNED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 02:03 PM   #15
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

He's baaaaack! About to hit 1,000!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.22073 seconds with 10 queries