|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-20-2006, 03:42 PM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
T4. Mark Brunell. Brunell's high accuracy percentage is even more impressive because he was very accurate at all depth levels. Brunell had the eighth-best deep pass accuracy percentage and also ranked in the top five in both the short- and medium-depth levels.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insid..._kc&id=2516953 Iis an espn INSIDER article so im not sure if everyone will be able to see it but i found it interesting nontheless. Not bad for an old man i suppose. I think, and im sure most of you agree, that these numbers will only improve with the addition of his new receivers.
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
Advertisements |
07-20-2006, 03:45 PM | #2 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,323
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
who are the top 5?
|
07-20-2006, 03:50 PM | #3 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
I dont even have to ask why he didnt make it to the pro bowl b/c it is all a popularity contest. If you are off their radar or friends list, you have to put in one solid year then redo it the next year to be considered. F- all that, but why make a fuss its just Mark though it be nice to send him to Hawaii on his way out of the league.
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts |
07-20-2006, 04:03 PM | #4 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
the top 5 are: 1. Marc Bulger
2. Carson Palmer 3. Griese 4. Hasselbeck/ Brunell 6. Kelly Holcomb The ratings were based on the balls thrown within receivers catching frames. Intentional overthrows or balls batted down are not included, as well as passes attempted while the QB is hit. Article by KC Joyner
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
07-20-2006, 04:08 PM | #5 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
Quote:
|
|
07-20-2006, 04:23 PM | #6 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
while i like brunell being ranked high in any publication, that list is a joke
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
07-20-2006, 04:23 PM | #7 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
Kelly Holcomb is on the list, so I'll take it with a grain of salt.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
07-20-2006, 04:38 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
Quote:
|
|
07-20-2006, 04:38 PM | #9 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
YEP...7. Brad Johnson
8. Peyton Manning 9. Byron Leftwich 10. Drew Brees 11. Aaron Brooks 12. David Carr 13. Anthony Wright 14. Chris Simms 15. Steve McNair REST OF THE LIST
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
07-20-2006, 11:22 PM | #10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
his "advanced" stats are retarded and incomplete. FO does a much better job.
|
07-20-2006, 11:53 PM | #11 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
It's just a ranking of passing accuracy. Of course Manning and Brady are the cream of the crop, but that doesn't mean they are also the most accurate QBs.
|
07-21-2006, 03:31 AM | #12 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
After watching the highlights of all the games last year with the exception of the first Giant game and the Denver game, it would be difficult to argue Brunell's accuracy. He made some exceptional throws from a variety. The only time he didn't play well was when he was injured. I was truly impressed with some of the passes he delivered last season.
|
07-21-2006, 07:52 AM | #13 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
I can't tell how Joyner is weighting the short, medium, and long ranges when he calculates his overall average.
I would think you'd want to give six times more weight to a 60 yard pass than you would a 10 yard pass. According to Joyner, Hasselbeck was 91% accurate in the "short range" and pretty average at the other distances. I'd think if you are weighting it properly, Hasselbeck's overall number would trend toward the average. After all, isn't the point of throwing a pass to move the ball downfield? An accurate pass that moves 30 yards should count three times as much as an accurate pass that moves the ball 10 yards.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
07-21-2006, 09:11 AM | #14 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Brunell tied for 4th in accuracy rating.
Quote:
There is quite a bit of subjectivety that goes into his calculations, even he admits that. |
|
|
|