|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-30-2006, 02:23 AM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
ROMO??? Why not JC???
FIRST, I want to say that I am not sold on Romo being that great, I am not saying that he will be playing in the pro-bowl (so if you do have a bad comment about his play save it to yourself, I am talking about QB changes here), but here what I do see, he did OK against a good D.
This is intersting since Dallas has to play Washington next Sunday. This reassures me that Jason Campbell would actually do better than MB. If not, then you will know little more about your QB of the future and if you might have to draft another one. I mean in the preseason JC would play in the 3rd or 4th quarter against the 2nd or 3rd Defense and he still didn't look like he could play that well. The otehr thing is the play-calling, I was watching Redskins pregame on Fox5 and they were talking about how AS is not the one calling the plays, I mean he is calling them but with restrictions. They were saying that they plays the Redskins are running right now are very similar to the ones last year. They said the Gibbs is not letting AS open-up his play-book. I have to be honest that I was not looking forward to the game next Sunday, but now it will be worth watching, who knows any given sunday a team could win. I am not saying that Dallas will win but hey at least it LOOKS LIKE we have a shot at a chance. Meanwhile, the G-wimps will have an easy game against the Texans, I hate them just as much as you guys do. I think changes are good sometimes regardless of the position and I think JC deserves a shot. Look at Leinart now or remeber Roethlisberger when he was a rookie, Chris Simms did OK, Delhome did OK, Jason Campbell should be a starter. |
Advertisements |
10-30-2006, 02:35 AM | #2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Not to say that Romo didn't play well, but if I'm Gregg Williams and I need to save the season, I'm thanking the football gods that I get to face Tony Romo and not Drew Bledsoe next week. Williams' defense hasn't confused anyone this year, and with Romo who is still very green, he gets another shot.
Jason Campbell will not make his first start against a division rival. He may play some in relief this week, but only if the situation appears dire.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
10-30-2006, 02:56 AM | #3 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
sucks to say, but i thought Romo looked fantastic for his first start. fresh legs, fresh arm and fresh eyes. he scrambled for firsts, threw on the move, and used the entire field.
unlike Brunell and Bledsoe, he'd lock on to his receiver right after the drop (as Madden also astutely noted), and would gun it to his primary option in tight spaces. the result was T.O.'s best game ever as a Cowboy. if Moss and Cooley caught as many in a game as T.O. and Whitten did tonight, we'd have a very different record, even with our beleagured defense.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
10-30-2006, 02:59 AM | #4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
i agree Gibbs won't start him next week, but how much *more* dire is dire enough?
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
10-30-2006, 05:54 AM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
why does AL Saunders continue to get a free pass? everyone looking for every reason in the world on why this offense is clicking. how about utilizing the players that we have, and not the ones we don't have. and our play calling has left alittle to be desired. i know for a fact that they ran the ball in Kansas city
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
10-30-2006, 06:43 AM | #6 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 55
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
I can say this. If the Cowboys go up by a couple of touchdowns or we have any problems scoring at all, I would hate to be Mark Brunell. FedEx will be getting ugly fast and calling for Brunell's head (even if it's our defenses fault).
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
10-30-2006, 08:50 AM | #7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 594
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Romo provides a spark to the Cowboys in a way Brunell never could for the Skins (other than one game last year). That said, I hope Tony falls flat on his face Sunday. It's Dallas Week!
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way. |
10-30-2006, 09:24 AM | #8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Romo scares me far more than Bledoe. Just as Campbell should scare the Cowboys far more than Brunell.
Campbell and Romo are very similiar -- Campbell just has a better arm.
__________________
"Lighten up, Sandy Baby." |
10-30-2006, 09:32 AM | #9 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 57
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Look at Gibbs avatars. Thats the way he looks all game long. No passion no concern no urgency no excitement no interest no winning record. This is why will not see JC.
|
10-30-2006, 09:52 AM | #10 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
So what you're saying is that Gibbs couldn't care less about what's happening. That he puts forth no effort into this organization. That he'd rather be at home watching reruns of The Cosby Show...
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
10-30-2006, 10:04 AM | #11 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 57
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Not at all...Im sure he cares but as a fan Id like to see more emotion. As im sure we all would. And Id say its a safe bet the players would too. The fought the guts out thing is old. Look at other coaches when a player F____ up. They get in their faces,stomp,throw things. Im not saying acting like an ass on the sideline would work but if Gibbs went postal a few times maybe the team would try harder. Hell im grasping for straws I know but just like any skin fan thats what we have to do.
|
10-30-2006, 10:16 AM | #12 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
What will more emotion from Gibbs accomplish other than making you feel better? You're basically asking him to be something he's not. He's always been stone faced in times of success or failure. That's just how he is, always even keeled.
|
10-30-2006, 10:22 AM | #13 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 57
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
He wasnt stone faced when we beat dallas last year. I thought he was gonna shit himself. I just dont see why so many people are defending EVERY thing he does. Im not gonna go into things that have been discussed a 1000 times but its tempting. Well one thing. If it aint broke dont fix it. Al Saunders.
|
10-30-2006, 10:25 AM | #14 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
I'm not trying to defend everything he does, I'm just trying to figure out what stomping about or getting in players' faces will accomplish. You're the one that threw that out there, so I'd just like to hear some rationale behind it. |
|
10-30-2006, 10:35 AM | #15 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 57
Posts: 67
|
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???
Quote:
|
|
|
|