Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2007, 12:05 AM   #1
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

I didn't see anything posted about this yet so...

JLC: "Anyway, as you all surely know by know they signed two O Linemen they brought in to the practice swuad - both tackes - Kevin Sampson and Calvin Armstrong. Cut OL Kili Lefotu and FB Brian Bell from the practie squad."
Redskins Insider

I dont know how interesting this is, probably just giving themselves insurance for injuries, and replacing Lefotu after his "incident." I doubt it means anything as far as the progression of the OL that are injured...make of it what you will.
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-17-2007, 12:06 AM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Calvin Armstrong was with us this summer right?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 12:11 AM   #3
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Calvin Armstrong was with us this summer right?
Yes he was; JLC:"They are working out three of them - Kevin Sampson (the tackle who played for Saunders who we wrote about in the paper today. Tackle Calvin Armstrong, who was with the team in camp, is also supposed to be here. There is another guard/center who is supposed to be here, but not sure who that is just yet."


WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 01:04 AM   #4
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Good news.

We need to "Coach 'em up" as they say. Let the Joe Bugel machine do it's thing.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:24 AM   #5
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

If we see Sampson and Armstrong on the field we're in trouble.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:44 AM   #6
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
Special Teams
 
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queens Village, NY
Age: 44
Posts: 349
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Well at least Sampson already knows the Al Saunders offense. The only we need to work on with him is his technique. I believe we are going to alright there at the tackle position. Sampson could come in and start. Look at the Kansas City Chiefs offensive line back then we they were explosive. They really did not have a legitimate right tackle and were able to run thru any defense. We just need a start LT like we do, mobile guards (Kendall and Thomas--I actually believe that DeMulling would be better than Fabini and the RG until Thomas comes back, a center that knows the calls-Rabach). Trust me we will get this running game going we just need the pass to open up the running game not the other way around.
Joe Gibbs needs to hold back this Redskins Football until he gets his O-lineman back. For now we need to be more Finesse in our blocking techniques. More trap running plays, half back draws, tosses and sweeps with Portis.
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:54 AM   #7
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
If we see Sampson and Armstrong on the field we're in trouble.
So far with all the injuries we have had the coaches have done a great job getting guys ready to step in. While it still is not as good as our starters would do I'd give them a B+ so far.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:55 AM   #8
chrisl4064
Registered User
 
chrisl4064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lake Travis, Texas
Age: 43
Posts: 786
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

are these guys any good at all, what are thier stats, who did they play for, are they rookies...?
chrisl4064 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 10:55 AM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Can it get any worse? Well I guess if can if Samuels and Kendall went down.

All I know is we can't continue on with these injuries, if Rabach and Wade can't get healthy in the long run we're going to be really screwed.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 11:17 AM   #10
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Can it get any worse? Well I guess if can if Samuels and Kendall went down.

All I know is we can't continue on with these injuries, if Rabach and Wade can't get healthy in the long run we're going to be really screwed.
I think the fact that we can still put together a decent line is un-effing-believable. If you were told about all of our injuries at the beginning of the season, what would you guess our record to be? I'd check the box for 0-5. Even though we're still 3-2, we were right in the two games that we lost. I think there are a couple reasons we've got to give this team some credit for.



1) The depth of our o-line. You've got to hand it to Bugel. I was writhing this off-season on how I felt our o-line was weak in depth, and I've been completely proven wrong. How many teams in the NFL could have lose two of their starters, then there back up, and still managed to perform. We'll continue to be tested throughout the season... but so far it looks promising.

2) Teams are afraid to attack Campbell. If I'm a defensive co-ordinator I'm not sending the house against JC. He reads the blitz better than anyone could have predicted. He's also got a great outlet (Chris Cooley) that he can basically just chuck the ball at and a catch will be made. He's hit Yoder on some nice scrambles, and he's improved his timing, pocket movement, and release. If your a beat up offensive line, the best thing you can have is a mobile QB who can pick up the blitz well. So far, it's been much better than anyone could have anticipated.

3) Coaching. Reasons 1 & 2 have been made possible, in part, by your Washington Redskins coaches. Thanks also goes out to those that make this possible, viewers like you.

But seriously... MVP goes to Bugel. It appears right now Joe Shmoe could walk onto this o-line and look at least adequate. It may be the schemes, it may be depth, it may be in part to Saunders' play calling. I don't know, but this guy over time has consistently fielded great offensive lines.


--------
At any rate. The verdict is still out for the rest of the season... and bar none the o-line worries me the most. I don't expect catastrophic results, and I've been conditioned to expect an adequate o-line out there. I guess we'll see.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 11:42 AM   #11
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobH4413 View Post
I think the fact that we can still put together a decent line is un-effing-believable. If you were told about all of our injuries at the beginning of the season, what would you guess our record to be? I'd check the box for 0-5. Even though we're still 3-2, we were right in the two games that we lost. I think there are a couple reasons we've got to give this team some credit for.



1) The depth of our o-line. You've got to hand it to Bugel. I was writhing this off-season on how I felt our o-line was weak in depth, and I've been completely proven wrong. How many teams in the NFL could have lose two of their starters, then there back up, and still managed to perform. We'll continue to be tested throughout the season... but so far it looks promising.

2) Teams are afraid to attack Campbell. If I'm a defensive co-ordinator I'm not sending the house against JC. He reads the blitz better than anyone could have predicted. He's also got a great outlet (Chris Cooley) that he can basically just chuck the ball at and a catch will be made. He's hit Yoder on some nice scrambles, and he's improved his timing, pocket movement, and release. If your a beat up offensive line, the best thing you can have is a mobile QB who can pick up the blitz well. So far, it's been much better than anyone could have anticipated.

3) Coaching. Reasons 1 & 2 have been made possible, in part, by your Washington Redskins coaches. Thanks also goes out to those that make this possible, viewers like you.

But seriously... MVP goes to Bugel. It appears right now Joe Shmoe could walk onto this o-line and look at least adequate. It may be the schemes, it may be depth, it may be in part to Saunders' play calling. I don't know, but this guy over time has consistently fielded great offensive lines.


--------
At any rate. The verdict is still out for the rest of the season... and bar none the o-line worries me the most. I don't expect catastrophic results, and I've been conditioned to expect an adequate o-line out there. I guess we'll see.
The O-Line is a major concern obviously. I just went back and watched the first part of the Green Bay game and watched Wade and Fabini on the right side. In my opinion they are a major liability even when they were healthy. Fabini is ok in pass pro, but still plays too high and could get overpowered pretty easily if he faces an elite DT. He is below to far below average in the run game and he is slow getting out in front of run plays (and struggles in inline blocking too, the movement stuff is just more obvious), though the Skins don't seem to be asking him to do that much, probably because they realize he is not able to do it very well. Every time the Packers brought pressure with their LBs from the right side they got through easily. They ran a couple of stunts with the Mike and Sam, Sam crashing inside, Mike looping over the top of him. Once Portis picked up the backer, the other time both Wade and Fabini both went with the DT and both LBs came free. It's an obvious point, but that right side was a problem before the injuries. The guys are serviceable but I think some might give them more credit than they probably deserve. There's obviously nothing the Skins can do, injuries are killing them, but I think if anyone goes back and really watches that right side you wouldn't say that they looked promising. The Skins are surviving despite those guys, not thriving because of them. Just my opinion.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 12:03 PM   #12
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,900
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan View Post
The O-Line is a major concern obviously. I just went back and watched the first part of the Green Bay game and watched Wade and Fabini on the right side. In my opinion they are a major liability even when they were healthy. Fabini is ok in pass pro, but still plays too high and could get overpowered pretty easily if he faces an elite DT. He is below to far below average in the run game and he is slow getting out in front of run plays (and struggles in inline blocking too, the movement stuff is just more obvious), though the Skins don't seem to be asking him to do that much, probably because they realize he is not able to do it very well. Every time the Packers brought pressure with their LBs from the right side they got through easily. They ran a couple of stunts with the Mike and Sam, Sam crashing inside, Mike looping over the top of him. Once Portis picked up the backer, the other time both Wade and Fabini both went with the DT and both LBs came free. It's an obvious point, but that right side was a problem before the injuries. The guys are serviceable but I think some might give them more credit than they probably deserve. There's obviously nothing the Skins can do, injuries are killing them, but I think if anyone goes back and really watches that right side you wouldn't say that they looked promising. The Skins are surviving despite those guys, not thriving because of them. Just my opinion.
Great analysis....tell us your opinion on Wade, we all kinda knew Fabini was marginal.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 12:25 PM   #13
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 2,638
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Nice post SC.

I think you alluded to my general point, that despite catastrophic injuries we are managing to survive. I'm curious to see how DeMuelling (or however you spell is last name) contribute to the system.

He's not known to be a bruiser, so maybe we should expect more outside runs to compliment his speed? It will definitely be an interesting watch on Sunday.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 12:52 PM   #14
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Yea, i think the oline is treading water which is not bad all things considered. It could have been a major catastrophy but it hasn't been up til now. The coaches i feel have done a great job so far, but coaches can't run block or pass block. There's only so much "coaching em up" to be done.

With our "backup" o line we've been marginal running the ball and ok pass protecting. I didn't go back and watch the game but i do remember Wade getting pancaked a couple of times by Kampman (sp?). I'm no expert by any means but it just looked like Wade's opponent was getting lower than he was and knocking him on his a**.

Don't get me wrong i think everyone has done a good job w/ what we have to work w/ so far. There's a reason that these new lineman don't have jobs, so there's only so much we can expect in the coming weeks.

I too was worried about our depth at oline coming into the season. I thought that the lack of drafting young talented o-lineman might hurt us, but some of our backups (heyer, fabini, wade) have done a serviceable job.

I'm not sure that teams are afraid to blitz JC though. If I'm AZ's D this week, they've got to be looking forward to facing what amounts to a 2nd string line.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 01:22 PM   #15
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins sign Calvin Armstrong and Kevin Sampson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Can it get any worse? Well I guess if can if Samuels and Kendall went down.

All I know is we can't continue on with these injuries, if Rabach and Wade can't get healthy in the long run we're going to be really screwed.

I agree, and I have to hand it to Bugel for having the players on hand be able to perform to the level they have already. We still have a long way to go, but the injuries to the o-line so far this season is something I've never witnessed before. Will be interesting to see how well we perform Sunday.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.55614 seconds with 10 queries