If we were to TRADE UP, who would you shoot for?

[jsarno]

I'm not saying we are going to trade up, we seem hell bent on giving our picks away with that Chad Johnson crap, but if we were to try to trade up, who would you target?
Seems Jake Long is taken, but Chris Long would be a great player, and even better, we could likely make a trade with the Raiders for their 5th pick and take Darren McFadden. I'm not trying to say that Portis is done, however, he is costing us the most money, and he won't be around forever, also the way Betts played is not convincing. McFadden seems to be a can't miss RB.

(please note, I am not interested in trading up, just not dismissing the possibility, and opportunity for discussion)

[jsarno]

By the way, you could also look to trade up the 2nd or 3rd picks too, not just 1st.

[SmootSmack]

Are you saying that if we were to trade up, you'd like to trade up for McFadden?

[GridIron26]

Chris Long, no question.. He wld be great compliment to Carter..

[Schneed10]

Recognizing that my posts are ignored by you, Jsarno, and hoping that someone will quote me and you'll see my message in their quote, you're an idiot.

Even if we traded our whole draft, we barely have enough value on the points chart to get up high enough to select a Chris Long. And the idea of trading up for McFadden when we've already got Portis locked into a long term deal is even more dumbfounding.

RETARDED THREAD.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Are you saying that if we were to trade up, you'd like to trade up for McFadden?

Depending on the deal, maybe.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by jsarno

Depending on the deal, maybe.

Retard.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Recognizing that my posts are ignored by you, Jsarno, and hoping that someone will quote me and you'll see my message in their quote, you're an idiot.

Even if we traded our whole draft, we barely have enough value on the points chart to get up high enough to select a Chris Long. And the idea of trading up for McFadden when we've already got Portis locked into a long term deal is even more dumbfounding.

RETARDED THREAD.

since you asked here's your quote

[Hog1]

That is humor!

[SC Skins Fan]

By the way, I think we should try to position ourselves to draft Chris Long, Keith Rivers, DRC, Branden Albert, Glenn Dorsey, Sedrick Ellis, and Derrick Harvey (for depth of course). THEN we'd really be sitting pretty. Not sure about McFadden, though, that there might be overkill

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

since you asked here's your quote

I expect more out of you matty. You shouldn't give in to the resident shit head.
please note two things (I don't expect the worst poster here to read everything, but I do expect others to)
1-

(please note, I am not interested in trading up, just not dismissing the possibility, and opportunity for discussion)

2-

By the way, you could also look to trade up the 2nd or 3rd picks too, not just 1st.

[jsarno]

Oh, and by the way mods...what happened to the attacking posters rule we have here...way to go for ignoring those rules and even encouraging them.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by jsarno

I expect more out of you matty. You shouldn't give in to the resident shit head.
please note two things (I don't expect the worst poster here to read everything, but I do expect others to)
1-
2-

Hopefully someone quotes me again...

Matty's not giving in to anything, he's The Ego around here. He clearly agrees with me that you're a retard. Put in a more PC manner, he agrees that this thread is ridiculous.

You may not be dismissing the possibility, but I am, because it's impossible. And discussing it is pointless because it will never happen, and furthermore Vinny is trying to trade DOWN, not up.

Discussing whether to trade up from the 2nd or 3rd rounders is fruitless until you know who has fallen down the draft board far enough to make it worthwhile.

You're a waste of bandwidth.

[SmootSmack]

Post #7 was probably crossing the line by Schneed. But post #5? No problem with that one. He attacked your idea, not you.

And why shouldn't he? On the one hand, you're complaining on this site about the Redskins throwing away their draft picks for Chad Johnson (even though it's really just one pick in 2008, and CJ has proven to be an elite WR, and we need a WR, and we can still fill several other needs even with this trade), yet here you are suggesting we trade up for Darren McFadden (even though that would mean giving up draft picks, McFadden is unproven, and RB is so low on the need list)

The thread may not be retarded, but your recommendation (especially in light of your Chad Johnson stance) is questionable, at best.

[Schneed10]

Apologies to the forum for going against the forum guidelines and attacking the poster in an immature manner.

For the record, in my opinion, these forums would be better off without said poster.