Pathetic!

saden1 · 10-17-2004, 06:55 PM

I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

RedskinRat · 10-17-2004, 06:59 PM

Saden1, when I'm agreeing with you it's a dark day indeed. I'm agreeing with you.

Brunell bring absolutely nothing, I'm sure he's a nice guy but he's holding the whole team back.

diehardskin2982 · 10-17-2004, 07:00 PM

ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

ArringtonRules · 10-17-2004, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

Well I'm sad to report after hearing the press conference after the game, Gibbs did'nt seem to find anything wrong with Brunell.. I hope he breaks down the film and realizes that this guys cannot throw deep and most NFL secondary right now DON'T RESPECT our passing game.
Today we had protection, and a good running game and we were playing the Bears who's secondary is not great and BRUNELL CAN'T EVEN COMPLETE HALF of his passes!! Gibbs need to rethink 'cause if our offense keeps on giving opposing teams so many chances and defense on the field for that long WE R GONNA LOSE..
C'MONS GIBBS MAKE THE CHANGE!!!

Bozzy · 10-17-2004, 07:25 PM

Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.

MTK · 10-17-2004, 07:30 PM

Brunell is Gibbs guy, let's lay off Snyder

wbecker999 · 10-17-2004, 07:37 PM

We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

MTK · 10-17-2004, 07:38 PM

I'll stick with Taylor over Roethisberger

Paintrain · 10-17-2004, 07:53 PM

I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

Daseal · 10-17-2004, 07:58 PM

Bozzy - This Brunell deal is ALL Gibbs. I've actually heard that Snyder didn't want to write that check, but Gibbs is Jesus isn't he?

This game was absolutely pathetic and nothing to get excited for except for Smoot, Washington, Taylor, and Portis (In no particular order). Playcalling was uninspired and boring. It was conservative to a fault. Although there were signs of promise, this offense CAN NOT excel with Mark Brunell at the helm. It's not often, but I was praying for an injury.

Jamaican'Skin · 10-17-2004, 08:00 PM

Gibbs must be seeing something in Mark that the rest of us aren't. I think the kid (Ramsey) should start, but its not looking too good for that.

offiss · 10-17-2004, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

Agreed! Although I missed today's game I saw some highlights, Portis, wow! Heck of a game, I heard a commentater say the skin's changed their running scheme a bit, is that true? I did see the highlight of Brunell throwing the ball out of bound's when he had I believe it was Coles wide open down the sideline for a TD, as well I see he gave up another TD, 28 point's in 5 1/2 games, I wonder if that's some kind of record? I am now becoming very incouraged thinking how good we can be with Ramsey in there? He will make play's, and he will only get better, Brunell has to go, we can't afford to drop 1 more game because of his inability at QB, I heard a post game comment that we absolutly dominated this game, if that's true, then it's an absolute joke that the bear's had an opportunity to tie, or beat us, with their last possesion, especially when Portis ran for over 170yds., no more excuses for Brunell, and how he need's a running game, he had one and failed miserably, our defense bailed him out big time!

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

Maybe sean taylor will realize he sucks and give him one

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbecker999

We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

Gmanc711 · 10-17-2004, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aehs77

As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

Maybe the system needs to fit the running back, like it did today. They totaly changed some of the plays they used Portis on and it showed. They need to adapt the system to Portis like they did today and they will be successfull.

10-17-2004, 06:55 PM	#1
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Pathetic! I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

10-17-2004, 06:59 PM	#2
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Saden1, when I'm agreeing with you it's a dark day indeed. I'm agreeing with you. Brunell bring absolutely nothing, I'm sure he's a nice guy but he's holding the whole team back.

10-17-2004, 07:00 PM	#3
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

10-17-2004, 07:25 PM	#5
Bozzy The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 44 Posts: 1,034	Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.

10-17-2004, 07:30 PM	#6
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Brunell is Gibbs guy, let's lay off Snyder

10-17-2004, 07:37 PM	#7
wbecker999 Camp Scrub Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Iowa Age: 49 Posts: 93	We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

10-17-2004, 07:38 PM	#8
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	I'll stick with Taylor over Roethisberger

10-17-2004, 07:53 PM	#9
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 Posts: 5,006	I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

10-17-2004, 07:58 PM	#10
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Bozzy - This Brunell deal is ALL Gibbs. I've actually heard that Snyder didn't want to write that check, but Gibbs is Jesus isn't he? This game was absolutely pathetic and nothing to get excited for except for Smoot, Washington, Taylor, and Portis (In no particular order). Playcalling was uninspired and boring. It was conservative to a fault. Although there were signs of promise, this offense CAN NOT excel with Mark Brunell at the helm. It's not often, but I was praying for an injury.

10-17-2004, 08:00 PM	#11
Jamaican'Skin The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Kingston, Jamaica Age: 38 Posts: 2,418	Gibbs must be seeing something in Mark that the rest of us aren't. I think the kid (Ramsey) should start, but its not looking too good for that.

Pathetic!

Locker Room Main Forum