|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-06-2010, 06:49 PM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Running Back Future
With Portis' and Bett's latest injuries, and options to get rid of either or both of them next year, should the Redskins look into another option to play there?
The unrestricted free agents were not particularly impressive. Guys such as Darren Sproles, Jerious Norwood, Mike Bell, Jerome Harrison, etc could be signed for next year if we truly look to turn the page from Portis and move on. If one of them could be signed relatively cheap I may be okay with it. Another option would be to look at mid to late round picks in the draft and consider guys such as Ryan Matthews from Fresno State or Dexter McCluster from Ole Miss. Other options may be Anthony Dixon from Mississippi State or Charles Scott at LSU. Should we not bring anybody in, Does Ganther continue to get a shot, and do we keep an injury-prone and aging Betts or Portis? Personally I think we should cut Betts and draft a running back in round 3 or 4. Keep Portis for one more year and continue to slowly rebuild. |
Advertisements |
01-06-2010, 06:51 PM | #2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Running Back Future
Quote:
Keep Rock and Ganther, draft a RB. Find a FA.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
01-06-2010, 06:54 PM | #3 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Running Back Future
I'm not sure the book is closed just yet on CP. It's close though.
I think we definitely need to draft someone and look at free agent options. I don't see a long term solution on the roster. Rock, Mason, Ganther are just #3 types. Not feature backs or even a #2 guy. |
01-06-2010, 06:55 PM | #4 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Running Back Future
What is a slow rebuild? Like we have 4 guys we can bring in but intentionally only get 2 of them?
|
01-06-2010, 07:01 PM | #5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: Running Back Future
|
01-06-2010, 07:03 PM | #6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Running Back Future
Quote:
The Ego.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
01-06-2010, 07:29 PM | #7 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 413
|
Re: Running Back Future
Quote:
|
|
01-06-2010, 07:33 PM | #8 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Running Back Future
Paging GTripp... if next year is uncapped, isn't that our magic window to unload CP and not take a massive hit for it?
If so, next year is like pirate amnesty day for bad backloaded contracts.
__________________
"To bring a Sherm Lewis in to a Jim Zorn and whoever his offensive coordinator is, it's like bringing in another man to help teach you how to make better love to your wife or something." -- Tre Johnson |
01-06-2010, 07:39 PM | #9 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,504
|
Re: Running Back Future
Get rid of Portis and Rock....see what Betts and Ganther have and draft decent RB...
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
01-06-2010, 07:47 PM | #10 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Running Back Future
I'd look for the team to acquire Peyton Hills, and though he has done much I'd like to see Norwood get a shot in Shanny's offense.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
01-06-2010, 07:53 PM | #11 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 46
|
Re: Running Back Future
I read that Alridge was a Shanahan guy..if this is true, isn't it intresting that he was just signed to a futures contract recently. I believe that we stick with Portis if he gets his stuff together and in addition we keep Alridge as a kick returner/slasher RB...and I'm cool with that providing Portis shows up and Alridge protects the ball.
__________________
Although these are trying times..I'm actually happy to be right here, right now with the Redskins. I'm standing by our owner. Joe Gibbs instilled Dan Snyder with the tools to do the right thing. We will return to the glory days! |
01-06-2010, 07:56 PM | #12 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,319
|
Re: Running Back Future
Why isn't there a lineman future thread?
Both JC and CP will be back. Shanny knows CP really well and he is just lighting a fire under him. |
01-06-2010, 08:29 PM | #13 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 20
|
Re: Running Back Future
the o-line should be priority number one,i would keep Betts and Q, and draft ryan mathhews if hes available later. Shanahan does have a proven track record of no-name RB's rushing for 1500 yds and about 12 tds
__________________
Officially jumped of the Clinton Portis bandwagon |
01-06-2010, 08:34 PM | #14 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,428
|
Re: Running Back Future
Because as much as people moan and groan about how vinny operated, linemen aren't sexy for fans to talk about either, now throw out a sharp styling running back or speedster WR, and armchair gm's are all over them
|
01-06-2010, 08:55 PM | #15 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Running Back Future
I wouldn't consider drafting a running back until the 4th round or later. Of the free agents available, I'd say Jerious Norwood, but now we have to look at what might fit best for Shanahan's system. Big, bruising running backs don't appear to be his favorites.
|
|
|