2nd round mock

[MTK]

PFT’s second-round mock draft | ProFootballTalk

[Ruhskins]

Terrible mock. I don't see the Bengals taking a QB. I just can't see us taking Smith either, as much as I like him.

[Monkeydad]

That is two HORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIBLE picks for us.

I should have expected garbage picks from PFT though.

[celts32]

Torrey Smith or any WR at #41 would be assinine IMO. Would rather draft Paea at #41. Would be happy with Mallett at #49...that seems like a good risk/reward spot for him. I don't see him lasting that long though.

[mredskins]

PFT must think Vinny is still drafting for us!

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

PFT’s second-round mock draft | ProFootballTalk

I just don't see us going Torrey Smith. Although we need WR help, we've got the some small fast WR's...Banks, Austin, Armstrong. Not saying we won't go w/ Hankerson or Little at some point, but who knows.

[Terpfan76]

Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Terpfan76

Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.

I was just gonna say the same thing

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by Terpfan76

Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.

Classic looks like Tarzan plays like Jane player from Maryland. He's basically a bigger version of Ted Ginn Jr. Great physical tools but only ran 4 routes in college. If we MUST go Receiver I would rather go Hankerson, Cobb, Little, or Young.

Still I have absolute contempt for Receivers. Guys who if you're lucky are only involved in 7 or 8 plays a game. Compare that to lineman who are involved in at least 30 to 40 plays a game, and QB's who handle the ball on 99% of offensive snaps that aren't punts and field goals.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Classic looks like Tarzan plays like Jane player from Maryland. He's basically a bigger version of Ted Ginn Jr. Great physical tools but only ran 4 routes in college. If we MUST go Receiver I would rather go Hankerson, Cobb, Little, or Young.

Still I have absolute contempt for Receivers. Guys who if you're lucky are only involved in 7 or 8 plays a game. Compare that to lineman who are involved in at least 30 to 40 plays a game, and QB's who handle the ball on 99% of offensive snaps that aren't punts and field goals.

Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by celts32

Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.

I'm with you guys.

This perspective makes Atlanta's trade seem even sillier. They gave up the farm for a guy who might have 7 touches a game.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by celts32

Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.

Agree! Although I would say linemen, then QB then CB then RB then WR.

[Redskin Jim]

Originally Posted by celts32

Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.

We need to take best NT, C, or QB with these picks. I'd love to steal a late rounder like Blackmon WR from Ok St, or his teammate Kendall Hunter RB.
It would be huge if we can make that happen.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

Agree! Although I would say linemen, then QB then CB then RB then WR.

Well in general I think QB is most important but as far as tonight goes I think we missed all the QB's that would have excited me so I would just as soon pass on the rest and try and fill some other holes with some big bodies.

And if there's any truth to the Raiders dangling their 2012 1st rounder then I am all over that. I would give them #41 straight up for that pick. That's an Andrew Luck lottery ball!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by celts32

Well in general I think QB is most important but as far as tonight goes I think we missed all the QB's that would have excited me so I would just as soon pass on the rest and try and fill some other holes with some big bodies.

And if there's any truth to the Raiders dangling their 2012 1st rounder then I am all over that. I would give them #41 straight up for that pick. That's an Andrew Luck lottery ball!

I'm with you on this. Though I'd take a flyer on a QB in the 4th (if we have a pick there) or 5th round this year. I've been saying we need two new QBs for a while. A young starter and a young backup.

Personally, I don't think the trade with the Raiders will happen. But they're definitely talking. Apparently, we're talking with the Niners as well. But I think everyone is, so that's not a big deal