|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-01-2013, 01:49 AM | #1 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Washington Post
I posted this in the Part Trios thread, but I though this may deserve its own thread. I'd like to hear what you guys think as it pertains to both Mike Wise's as well as Donovan McNabb's advice for III and II. I completely understand why III and his camp did not contact McNabb after he tried to get in touch with him last year. Why would you call someone who throws your coach under the bus and says he will be the reason why you fail? Then why would you call him now after he airs out his opinions on how you are handling your life this offseason in the local paper? McNabb to me does not come off as genuine. He is just getting his name in the papers again. If he was genuine he would not have sat down in an interview to voice to him why he should have called him. He could have sent him an email not a public invitation.
__________________
Just win. |
Advertisements |
06-01-2013, 01:57 AM | #2 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
I used to have a lot of respect for McNabb.
Used to ...
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
06-01-2013, 02:30 AM | #3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
I really hate mike wise
|
06-01-2013, 08:26 AM | #4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
I feel that McNabb comes off as genuine in the article, that he honestly cares and is trying to be a friend, but again, as others have stated, this needed to be done behind closed doors and not on a national scene. Somehow McNabb could have tracked down RG3, who i'm sure would have been receptive to meeting him....
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up |
06-01-2013, 10:41 AM | #5 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
McNabb is a fraud and definitely not the type of person I'd want in RG3's ear.
|
06-01-2013, 10:58 AM | #6 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
bottom line ... RGIII has his head screwed on right. He's got solid, grounded parents. He'll be fine.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
06-01-2013, 11:00 AM | #7 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
J. Keim cannot get to the Post fast enough. He will upgrade their content 1000%.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
06-01-2013, 11:10 AM | #8 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Yeah and obviously he's not perfect, nobody is. But overall he's heading in the right direction. He doesn't need a bum like McNabb giving him advice on how to handle things.
|
06-01-2013, 11:13 AM | #9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
McFlabb needs to stfu and go away.
I fail to see how he needs to get involved with anything regarding RGIII. And Mike Wise is an effing tool.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
06-01-2013, 12:18 PM | #10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
As soon as I saw the article today in the Post I read "McNabb" "advice" and "By: Mike Wise" and immediately went to read about the NBA.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
06-01-2013, 01:43 PM | #11 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Quote:
But seriously what a poisonous article this was. He bashes his old coach while trying to get the team's new QB to listen to his advice.... Like that would go over well at Redskins Park and with the fan base. Take advice from the QB who was awful here and refused to work with the coaches.
__________________
Just win. |
|
06-01-2013, 01:54 PM | #12 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,612
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Mike Wise makes Greg Doyel look like Mike Wallace. Had no clue trolls could be journalist.
McNabb character is more disappointing than his actual skill on the field.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
06-01-2013, 02:05 PM | #13 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Yup. DMac5 could have a beautiful NFL legacy but he keeps screwing it up with classless words and actions.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
06-01-2013, 02:19 PM | #14 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,501
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
Quote:
I will add that Mike Wise is horrible. This moron continues to grasp at straws and instigates the public to drum up any type of attention. **** this assclown.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
06-01-2013, 02:52 PM | #15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: Donovan McNabb's comments in the Washington Post
I couldnt agree more. When did journalists thrust aside impartiality in an effort to BE the story?
|
|
|