Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


QB controversey?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: After 2 preseason games, who is your starter?
Ramsey 51 89.47%
Brunell 4 7.02%
Campbell 2 3.51%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2005, 09:37 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
QB controversey?

vote and discuss
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-22-2005, 09:48 AM   #2
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: QB controversey?

Ramsey played great at the end of the season and is improving game-by-game this preseason.

And again, this is only preseason. Yes, Brunell has been showing he can school 2nd and 3rd stringers. The good I see in him being "back to his old self" is that we have a good backup in case Ramsey goes down.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:50 AM   #3
PSUSkinsFan21
The Starter
 
PSUSkinsFan21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
Re: QB controversey?

:thumb: Ditto for me MC.

It might be a different story if Brunell was going up against the first string defenses and lighting it up.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!"
PSUSkinsFan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:53 AM   #4
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: QB controversey?

Same here. Brunell might be a better QB than his performance last season would have you believe, but Ramsey deserves a REAL shot at the starting job.

Virtually everyone was ready to lynch Brunell last season. Now, after a few good performances in preseason games against backups, people are acting like he's Peyton Manning stuck behind Ryan Leaf. Crazy...
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:53 AM   #5
BrudLee
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Re: QB controversey?

It's difficult to blame Ramsey when the two preseason games he's played in have almost by design eliminated the running game. Portis has one carry in the preseason, which means defenses don't have to show the same respect for the run they would otherwise.

Now, Ramsey has made some mistakes. He will likely continue to do so. Hopefully, when defenses are showing us 8 in the box, his mistakes will not be capitalized on. He is the best option we have now, by a healthy margin.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:53 AM   #6
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 54
Posts: 2,015
Re: QB controversey?

Ramsey is still the guy. If he costs us a couple of games early in the season due to his poor decision making, then I think you go to the backup.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:55 AM   #7
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: QB controversey?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcjr14
Ramsey is still the guy. If he costs us a couple of games early in the season due to his poor decision making, then I think you go to the backup.
At the VERY least, I think you've got to give him 6 or 7 games. I'd like to see him in for the entire season.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:56 AM   #8
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: QB controversey?

Also, Ramsey has been making great reads against blitzes (not to mention our o-line has been picking them up without problems).
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 09:57 AM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
Re: QB controversey?

Ramsey, because he showed last year that he can manage the offense well. He has made obvious strides with touch passes down the field. He isn't that accurate with it yet, but last year he just gunned everything. The few deep passes he threw would be lasers that sailed over the WRs head. Now he seems to be putting air under it, dropping the pass down over the CB's head and into the receiver's hands. That's what we need in order to seriously threaten the deep part of the field and keep 8 men out of the box. His accuracy isn't there yet, but I think it will get better with time. Ramsey is definitely not perfect, I think he's going to throw a fair amount of interceptions unless Gibbs starts calling the game more conservatively. But he knows how to manage the game and make some plays.

If it were Brunell starting though, I wouldn't be upset at all. I don't see much of a dropoff, if any, between the two of them. I think Brunell's miserable performance last year was mainly due to horrendous offensive line play and a lack of separation from the WRs. I think his elbow may have been bothering him too. His arm looks healthy, and the O-Line would give him the time he needs to play well. Brunell has always been able to throw a nice touch-pass deep downfield. Plus the players seem to respond to him.

I feel relatively fine with either one of them. But I'll take Ramsey because of how he did at the end of last year. We just have to be ready to deal with some INTs. I have a feeling he's going to be frustrating for us.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:01 AM   #10
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: QB controversey?

Gibbs start calling the game more conservatively?! Urgh, not something I want to see!

I will say this... I think that while it doesn't count, they're telling Ramsey to "let-er-rip" and see how he does. I'm sure if these games counted, they'd be running more to set up the pass so that once they stack the box, Ramsey can hit some easy quick slants to Moss or Patten and they'd be gone.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:02 AM   #11
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: QB controversey?

Ramsey! I think he deserves more time to develop a chemistry with his NEW receivers, and the changes in the offense. Yes, he's made some bad decisions, but it's the preseason and hopefully he'll learn from all his mistakes. Lets not forget that Portis has barely played (1 carry in 2 preseason games), and Ramsey can benefit from a solid running game. Less pressure on Ramsey will make him more and more comfortable.

Brunell has looked good against the 2nd and 3rd stringers. He seems to have regained that mobility he always had, but never showed it last year because of his hamstring injury. I think we ourselves a great backup in Brunell, and if Ramsey were to fall to an injury (lets hope he doesn't!!!), I think Brunell can come in and win us some games.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:02 AM   #12
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
Re: QB controversey?

Ramsey and Brunell are both very inconsistent and I do not want either to be my starting QB.

Ramsey isnt hitting open guys, he has extremely happy feet, and on third and longs he looks short first. Brunell is the same Brunell that he was last year. He is making some very nice throws and making plays, but the first preseason game he did the same crap. Under pressue he would roll out and then throw it soaring over a receivers head or just throw it away. He doesnt make plays when you need them.

I was very upset that Campbell didnt play the last game. Clearly, hes not going to be our starter, but I dont expect us to have many wins (because of our offense) with either of those two QBs. If one of them steps up, I think at best they just dont make us lose, but they dotn do things to make us win.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:02 AM   #13
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
Re: QB controversey?

That said, Brunell would probably be a little frustrating too. He looks good now in preseason against scrubs, but I'd be kidding myself if I said that he looks like he's back to his prime form from his Jacksonville days. I don't think he's the same player as he was then, can't scramble as well and there are some throws he can't make any more. But he could manage the game just about as effectively as Ramsey in my opinion.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:08 AM   #14
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
Re: QB controversey?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
Gibbs start calling the game more conservatively?! Urgh, not something I want to see!

I will say this... I think that while it doesn't count, they're telling Ramsey to "let-er-rip" and see how he does. I'm sure if these games counted, they'd be running more to set up the pass so that once they stack the box, Ramsey can hit some easy quick slants to Moss or Patten and they'd be gone.
I don't want to see Gibbs go as conservative as last year, but I definitely don't want to see him cutting Ramsey loose like he is in the preseason. Did you know the Redskins rank 2nd in the NFL in pass yards per game so far in the preseason? Philly is first.

That's abnormal for a Joe Gibbs team. I think he's just calling pass after pass because he's just trying to assess what works. He's probably trying to figure out which plays work and which don't. When the regular season comes, I think he'll call running plays about as often as he did last year. The only thing is he'll pick his spots to go deep this year, and he'll probably choose to use the plays that he sees working here in the preseason.

I think he's using the preseason as a guinea pig of sorts, a test-run of the passing game. But he'll end up using his normal offensive style. All Clinton Portis, all the time, but with just a few deep passes mixed in. Which makes sense. After all, Clinton is our best offensive player. I maintain that the deep passing game is there primarily to give Portis room to run and take over games.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 10:10 AM   #15
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: QB controversey?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
Ramsey and Brunell are both very inconsistent and I do not want either to be my starting QB.

Ramsey isnt hitting open guys, he has extremely happy feet, and on third and longs he looks short first. Brunell is the same Brunell that he was last year. He is making some very nice throws and making plays, but the first preseason game he did the same crap. Under pressue he would roll out and then throw it soaring over a receivers head or just throw it away. He doesnt make plays when you need them.

I was very upset that Campbell didnt play the last game. Clearly, hes not going to be our starter, but I dont expect us to have many wins (because of our offense) with either of those two QBs. If one of them steps up, I think at best they just dont make us lose, but they dotn do things to make us win.
Skins, I could not have said it better myself. The best we can hope for with these QBs is that they dont lose games because they wont do anything to help the team win.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.36576 seconds with 11 queries